Search for: "AT&T"
Results 2401 - 2420
of 881,723
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2017, 10:00 am
M&T’s principal banking subsidiary, M&T Bank, ... [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 3:37 pm
This looks like it will be a very interesting and potentially very important copyright conference at U of T on October 2, 2015.The star of the event will no doubt be the Honourable Ian Binnie,C.C., Q.C, a retired Supreme Court of Canada justice whose decision in Théberge v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 12:21 pm
We know it can’t, because Mayor Bloomberg has assured us that smoking bans don’t cut into restaurants’ business. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 10:23 am
Because you can’t fix something if you don’t know it’s broken. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm
Both the patent proprietor and the opponent filed an appeal against the decision of the Opposition Division to maintain the opposed patent in amended form.Among other things, the Board had to deal with the (not so frequent) request to exclude a document from file inspection:[1.1] With its grounds of appeal opponent I filed D14 which is a document concerning a global offering of shares in Guala Closures S.p.A. [read post]
5 May 2008, 9:10 am
Sprint Nextel’s stock rose more than 6 percent Monday morning following reports that Deutsche Telekom was considering buying it — but investors might want to be wary. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 11:01 am
This is another examination appeal.Claim 1 of the main request before the Board read:1. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 9:59 pm
estoy muy preocupada porfavor ayudenme, tengo una deuda con una tarjeta de credito bancomer y un credito personal de esos k otorgan los cajeros automaticos, el problema es que me he visto en problemas economicos uno tras otro y kedare temporalmente sin trabajo por unos meses ya k trabajo por contrato. tengo apenas 4 meses pagando tanto el credito como la tarjeta pero por ejemplo el credito personal ya me estan hablando porque no hice el deposito este mes. el adeudo de la tarjeta es de 38000 y ... [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 3:01 pm
Article 13(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of appeal provides that “[a]ny amendment to a party’s case after it has filed its grounds of appeal or reply may be admitted and considered at the Board’s discretion. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm
In case you had doubts – Article 12(4) RPBA also applies to late filed objections, as the present decision illustrates[1] In the “Notice of opposition”, the opponent/appellant raised an objection under A 100(b) concerning the plasmid shown in Figure 2B and described in Example 2 of the patent-in-suit. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm
In this revocation appeal case, the patent proprietor – in the course of the oral proceedings (OPs) – requested the Board to hear an expert.[4.1] Claim 1 of new auxiliary request 2 differs from the claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 in that the cell is now restricted to the species Lactococcus lactis […].[4.2] During the discussion of the admissibility of new auxiliary request 2, the [patent proprietor] requested that Mr Johansen be allowed to speak about “their experience of… [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
Opponent 3 was the only party to file an appeal against the decision of the Opposition Division to maintain patent EP 1 022 787 in amended form.This patent was based on a divisional application from application EP 0 400 146 filed by Siemens AG. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:01 pm
This is an appeal against the revocation of the opposed patent. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
The opponent filed an appeal after the Opposition Division had maintained the patent in amended form.Claim 1 of the main request before the Board read (in English translation; amendments with respect to claim 1 as granted are underlined)1. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm
In this case the patent proprietor questioned the authorisation of one of the professional representatives of the opponent:[1] With letter dated 2 November 2012, the [opponent] informed the board and the [patent proprietor] that Mr S., a professional representative, would represent the [opponent] jointly with Mr M., the professional representative already acting on behalf of the [opponent]. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 3:01 pm
In the present case the examining division rejected the application, since the claimed method of identifying an integrated circuit (IC) was a juxtaposition or aggregation of features known from the prior art and did therefore not involve an inventive step. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 3:01 pm
This decision deals with the refusal of an application by the Examining Division (ED), on the ground of lack of inventive step. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
This revocation appeal contains some interesting passages one of which concerns the admissibility of the opposition:[1.1] Mr K. filed the opposition under the letter head of his firm and signed as patent attorney. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 11:01 am
The applicant filed an appeal after the Examining Division (ED) had refused his application.The following paragraphs are taken from the Board’s discussion of the admissibility of the main request and of auxiliary request 1: [4] According to the established case law of the Boards of Appeal, the function of appeal proceedings is to give a decision upon the correctness of a separate earlier decision taken by a department of first instance (cf. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 6:01 pm
Disclaimers inserted during examining proceedings also create presumptions concerning the exclaimed subject-matter, as the appellant in the present case had to find out.The patent proprietor appealed against the decision of the Opposition Division to revoke the patent under consideration.Claim 1 of the main request before the Board read (in English translation; the differences with respect to claim 1 as granted are emphasized):Crop protection composition, formulated as powder, granules or as a… [read post]
