Search for: "C Frank"
Results 2401 - 2420
of 3,614
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2019, 1:20 pm
| The Opinion of the Advocate General in the case C-443/17 (Abraxis case). [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 1:31 am
Never too late 75 [week ending on Sunday 6 December] – BHG on blocking injunctions | IP in Universities | Sweden on blocking injunctions | Canadian musings on patents | US Senate and trade secret reform | Chinese IP Courts | G1/14 referral and Article 108 EPC | PACE procedure (Procedure for Accelerated Conduct of Examination) ant the EPO | Greekat and trade mark partenalism | EPO Boards of Appeal tell AC: we were never consulted | What hacker… [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 1:31 am
| Recovery for pecuniary loss and moral prejudice | EU Trade Secrets Directive | Journal d’Anne Frank as a trade mark?! [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 10:24 am
| The Opinion of the Advocate General in the case C-443/17 (Abraxis case). [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 6:46 am
Yesterday was the first day of the seven-week Colloquium on High-End Inequality that I am co-leading with Robert Frank. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 4:30 am
Renfro, Florida State University, “Criminalizing CARE: AIDS, the Ryan White CARE Act, and the Politics of Innocence”Kirstine Taylor, Ohio University, “Producing Racial Innocence: The Fall of Chain Gangs and the Rise of Prisons in North Carolina"Abby Whitaker, Temple University, “‘C is for Colorblindness’: Sesame Street, Race, and the Transformation of Liberalism"REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS AND POLITICS Moderator: Gillian Frank, Host… [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:03 am
In addition, he observed that because the conduct in the DRW case ended prior to Dodd-Frank, it was not charged using the CFTC’s 180.1(c) authority, and under that regime, the case could potentially look different. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 9:59 pm
As Cécile Fabre points out, it is “virtually impossible” to determine whether an individual’s social right has been violated: judges are not competent (term of art) to compare different permutations and combinations of resource allocations. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 4:11 pm
The Court in Springerreviewed three aspects of section 1(c) of the CGIA and determined:1. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 6:25 am
Geoffrey C. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 2:51 am
Such modes of service where the defendant is likely to be domiciled in another state have been condemned as insufficient by the ECJ in cases such as: Case 166/80 Peter Klomps v Karl Michel [1981] ECR 1593; Case C-300/14 Imtech Marine Belgium NV v Radio Hellenic SA ECLI:EU:C:2015:825; Case C-289/17 Collect Inkasso OU v Aint 2018 EU:C:2018. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 1:49 am
See Article 18.01(c) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 7:00 am
Bloomberg, Council Speaker Christine C. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 12:35 pm
Descarga aquí la Ley Dodd-Frank Archivado en: Arbitrios, Banca, Valores y Cooperativas, Contribuciones, Corporaciones, Desarrollo Económico, Economía, EVENTOS, Finanzas y Valores, Mercantil [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 7:28 am
… The Dodd-Frank Act directed the SEC – for security-based swaps – and the CFTC – for all other swaps – to create an entirely new regulatory regime for this massive market. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 9:34 am
It identified: (a) every case in which the whistleblower represented him or herself, and the awards obtained; (b) the identity of every case where a whistleblower was represented by an attorney; (c) the name of each case matched with the attorney or pro se whistleblower [this enabled Platt to carefully review the facts of each case and the basis for each award in an attempt to identify misconduct]; and the amounts of awards obtained. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 3:46 pm
Dembitz and C. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 6:36 pm
Whitney Initial Scheduling Order (District Judge Frank D. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 12:35 pm
Descarga aquí la Ley Dodd-Frank Archivado en: Arbitrios, Banca, Valores y Cooperativas, Contribuciones, Corporaciones, Desarrollo Económico, Economía, EVENTOS, Finanzas y Valores, Mercantil [read post]
14 May 2015, 12:42 pm
An agreement shall not be deemed unconscionable unless the circumstances set out in subsection c. of this section are applicable.
37:2-39 Enforcement of premarital or pre-civil union agreement; marriage or civil union determined void If a marriage or civil union is determined to be void, an agreement that would otherwise have been a premarital or pre-civil union agreement is enforceable only to the extent necessary to avoid an inequitable result.
37:2-40 … [read post]
