Search for: "Cash v. Cash"
Results 2401 - 2420
of 8,558
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2018, 4:14 pm
The Supreme Court’s most recent appraisal decision, Dell, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 5:21 am
My daughter worked part-time this past year for a woman who paid her about $500 cash. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:29 am
Defendant on Both Sides of Cash-Out Merger Fails to Win Dismissal of Minority Shareholder Suit Alleging Inadequate Consideration RAL Capital Ltd. v CheckM8, Inc., 2017 NY Slip Op 32000(U) [Sup Ct NY County Sept. 21, 2017]. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 6:55 am
In my view, courts should award damages on a dollar-for-dollar in basis for transient damages and on a price earnings (“P/E”) multiple or discounted cash flow (“DCF”) basis where damages are non-transient. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 9:18 am
The court also cites StubHub v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 9:18 am
The court also cites StubHub v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 6:44 am
In United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 3:00 am
Governance Survey: Silicon Valley v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 11:10 am
Marlow v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 11:10 am
Marlow v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 8:17 am
The result is that marijuana sales are conducted almost exclusively on a cash basis. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 3:00 am
For those that have limits, our limits apply to: – Cash only – 0% – Equity only – 56% – Both cash & equity – 44% 3. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 2:57 pm
In Negus v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 8:00 am
Imagine the president pardoned Arpaio in exchange for $1 million in cash. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 6:24 am
Potter closes the door, keeping the $8000 cash. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 5:12 pm
- 9th Circuit says No (Arellano v Clark Cty. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 5:12 pm
Hill, Jr. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 10:21 am
Adamian v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 8:00 am
Third, the absence of standard rates for cash assistance results in risk of inconsistency between authorities. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:59 am
Moreover Dano sealed the argument that without any specific requirement or condition of EU law, decisions about the level of non-contributory benefits fall outside the CFR’s scope because the CJEU held that member states are not implementing EU law by prescribing conditions for the grant of special non-contributory cash benefits and the extent of such benefits. [read post]
