Search for: "DAY v. USA" Results 2401 - 2420 of 2,775
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2010, 7:04 am by Adam Chandler
Reporting and commentary on the import of last month’s ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 7:39 am by Jay Willis
City of Chicago, Doe No. 1 v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 10:13 pm by TSLP
The MLS collective bargain agreement expires in a few days. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 11:01 am
The lawsuit not only seeks to undo the acquisition of the two dairy processing plants, but also seeks to require Dean Foods to notify the Justice Department at least 30 days prior to any future acquisition involving a milk processing operation.Text of the complaint in U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 8:51 pm by cdw
The Court also decided Wood v. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 12:07 pm
The court will not afford any special deference to the USPTO's interpretation under either Chevron USA v Natural Resources Defense Council (1984) or Skidmore v Swift (1944) when the statutory language is so "clear, unambiguous and intolerant" of such interpretation (see page 13 of the judgment). [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 10:44 am by Michael Ginsborg
Nimocks, [Trial Updates - Day 8], 01/22/10 ADF News ReleaseLisa Leff, Prop. 8 Proponent to Be Called as Hostile Witness, 01/21/10 APBlogsNCLR’s Legal Director Shannon Minter on Perry v Schwarzenegger Proceedings, Day 8, 01/21/10 Pam's House BlendProtectMarriage.com's GC Andrew Pugno, A Head Shaker of an Afternoon, 01/21/10 ProtectMarriage.com Action FundBrian Leubitz, William Tam: He’s like that Cute Ignorant Uncle That Everybody Cringes At, 01/21/10… [read post]
16 Jan 2010, 7:17 am by Greg Herman-Giddens
  Marc has published numerous articles and been quoted in the Forbes.Com, Fox Business, Naval Reserve Association Magazine, Rhode Island Bar magazine, Bradenton Herald, Lawyers USA, and Military.com. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 1:11 pm by WIMS
Present day taxpayers and sewer services users should not be severely penalized for longstanding neglect on the part of the defendant. [read post]