Search for: "DOMINIC v. STATE"
Results 2401 - 2420
of 4,085
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2020, 8:06 pm
Bailey and Timothy Caulfield state, One concern that consistently emerges in relation to obtaining genetic information is the worry that an individual may be discriminated against on the basis of his or her genetic make-up and, specifically, on the basis of a predisposition to a certain condition or disease. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
So too, in Flowers v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 10:03 am
More specifically, [Musarella] argues that two of the necessary elements of fiduciary duty, i.e., de facto control and dominance, were absent herein. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 11:34 am
In Michael Toth v Emirates [2011] EWPCC 18, 13 June 2011.) [read post]
22 Dec 2019, 10:26 am
However, it also emphasised that, even though the legalisation of cannabis for therapeutic and recreational purposes is under discussion across the EU, the consumption and use of cannabis containing THC above a stated threshold remains illegal in most EU Member States. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 11:30 am
That strategy helped secure the unanimous 1991 Supreme Court ruling in UAW v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 6:30 am
They narrate the story—in which the Cherokee Nation’s startling victory in Worcester v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 12:24 pm
As we have seen in certain high-profile cases (Tfue v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 3:33 am
The Board of Regents, The University of Texas System v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 7:36 am
Some legal practitioners adopted a conservative attitude trying to fit the tokens of their clients within the tests provided by the 1946 SEC v. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 9:33 am
Initiatives are underway in multiple states, and it varies by state whether Democrats or (as in Arizona) Republicans take the lead.On the other side of the Big Pond, Apple's purely pretextual defenses of its app store monopoly are falling apart. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 8:57 pm
In September 2006, Conte brought this action, claiming that Newsday and Conte’s distributors violated federal RICO, the Lanham Act, the Sherman Act, and the Electronic Privacy Act and committed various state law torts in attempting to monopolize and dominate the print advertising sales and pre-printed, free standing insert distribution sales markets on Long Island. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 8:07 am
The Supreme Court struck down a strikingly similar law, also in Florida, nearly 50 years ago, in a case called Miami Herald v. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 7:26 am
In all likelihood, once the Court is not dominated by partisan Republicans, they will be crushed. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 5:23 am
Contrary to those accounts, Brown v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:19 pm
[A-G Dominic Grieve, December 2011] “You can’t say you haven’t been warned from the man himself. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 5:04 am
The UK Secretary of State for Justice, Kenneth Clarke recently released his government’s Draft Defamation Bill. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 8:24 am
Woods T.C.J. for the court stated: “I would view the personal element of the expense to be the dominant aspect”, thereby denying the expense as a business expense. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 6:24 am
In Perry v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 2:44 pm
See Hurley v. [read post]
