Search for: "Dennis Crouch"
Results 2401 - 2420
of 2,728
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2011, 8:00 pm
by Dennis Crouch International harmonization has always been seen as a major purpose of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 6:39 am
Dennis Crouch writes in this post, "Although some responses showed support for the legislation, the weight of responses opposed the reforms, and the median response opposed the Bill. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 9:13 am
In a survey conducted on Dennis Crouch's PatentlyO blog, respondents showed a notable lack of support for reforms. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 5:20 am
by Dennis Crouch Patent Law Persists: At this point, it appears very likely that the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (H.R. 1249) will become law later this month. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 10:08 am
Thank you – Dennis. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 1:20 pm
David Abrams and Dennis Crouch have published a comparative study on the switch from a first-to-invent system to a first-to-file system in Canada and applied the analysis to the potential change to the US patent system by the America Invents Act. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 7:25 am
By Jason Rantanen Earlier this week I mentioned a recent article by Dennis Crouch and Robert P. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:03 am
Dennis Crouch at Patently-O notes that over the past year-and-a-half, 52 utility patents have issued that each cite more than 2,500 references. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 7:28 pm
One strategy for addressing this issue - and for streamlining patent litigation generally - is to decide cheaper and easier issues early in the litigation process, a concept discussed by Dennis Crouch and Robert P. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 8:51 am
Cir. 2011) By Dennis Crouch Note: This is an important case that clarifies a Federal Circuit rule of contract interpretation. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 11:52 am
Cir. 2011) By Dennis Crouch Note: This case supports the already accepted notion that the presumptive bar to the doctrine of equivalents created by a narrowing amendment during patent prosecution is very difficult to overcome. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 11:26 am
by Dennis Crouch In most cases, patent enforcement actions and resulting license agreements (settlements) avoid antitrust scrutiny. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 11:46 am
Mark Lemley (Stanford)Thomas Field (New Hampshire)Ted Sichelman (UCSD)Peter Menell (Berkeley)Robert Merges (Berkeley)Lee Petherbridge (Loyola)Gregory Mandel (Temple)Dennis Crouch (Missouri)Scott Hemphill (Columbia)Dan Burk (Irvine)Rochelle Dreyfuss (NYU)Jason Rantanen (Iowa)Jay Kesan (Illinois)Shamnad Basheer (West Bengal National University)James Bessen (Research on Innovation)Gideon Parchomovsky (Penn)Ralph Clifford (U Mass Dartmouth)Jonathan Masur (Chicago)Ronald Mann… [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 7:28 am
(Supreme Court 2011) by Dennis Crouch The Supreme Court has agreed to hear Mayo's petition on the patentable subject matter eligibility of medical diagnostic methods. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 5:15 am
by Dennis Crouch I see the above chart is indicative of patent applicants' shift away from filing patent applications that particularly identify the inventive features of the inventions being patented. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 2:05 pm
Dennis Crouch's Patently-O commented "the court acknowledged policy arguments both for and against a strong presumption of validity (Citing Lemley & Lichtman), but in the end decided that it was bound to follow Congress and the common law precedent. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 5:07 am
The above decision has been comprehensively reviewed in yesterday's posting by Dennis Crouch, but it is of interest because it provides a sign that the analogous art tests in Europe and in the US may not be as different as previously believed For a primary reference, the black-letter law of the EPO as explained in the Case Law of the Boards of Appeal is that it is normally a prior art document should be selected disclosing subject-matter conceived for the same purpose or… [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:38 am
Cir. 2011) (Judges Newman, Schall, and Linn) by Dennis Crouch In an important nonobviousness decision the Federal Circuit has sided with the patent applicant, Arnold Klein and rejected the USPTO's obviousness conclusions. [read post]
31 May 2011, 6:15 am
by Dennis Crouch Professors Don Chisum and Janice Mueller are two of the leading patent law experts in the US. [read post]
20 May 2011, 11:07 am
By Dennis Crouch In the comment section of a prior post, I highlighted a an Office Action asking an applicant (Intellectual Ventures) to provide further background information on their invention, including "a detailed summary of the improvements" associated with the invention and "any technical information known to Applicant concerning the related art. [read post]
