Search for: "Doe VI "
Results 2401 - 2420
of 5,623
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2009, 4:49 am
The Court made clear it does not consider arbitration in lieu of court to be a substantive change, but rather merely a change of forum. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 5:10 am
VI, cl. 2). [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 6:20 pm
” According to the report, BAuA currently considers it necessary for ECHA to examine first if all information according to REACH Annex VI are available within the framework of a compliance check. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 8:47 am
Here’s how the territory was defined as: (i) the entire world; (ii) North America; (iii) the United States ofAmerica; (iv) each state in which the Company does business or didbusiness at any time within two (2) years prior to the termination of myemployment with the Company; (v) the States of Maryland, Virginia,North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia; (vi) the State of NorthCarolina; and (vii) Wake County.Op. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
It should act now by amending Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 so that private individuals can go to court to address the unintentional discriminatory acts which continue to have such a devastating impact on their lives. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 12:42 pm
Moreover, Section 41.2 (2) states that the Governor in Council may make regulations prescribing additional circumstances in which paragraph 41.1(1)(a) does not apply, after taking into consideration the following factors: (i) whether not being permitted to circumvent a technological measure that is subject to that paragraph could adversely affect the use a person may make of a work, a performer’s performance fixed in a sound recording or a sound recording when that use is… [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:11 pm
So I offer this new posting:Let me suggest that reference to the JFK speech (or, for that matter, to Article VI's "no religious test oath clause") is quite irrelevant if candidates themselves place their religious views front and center about "who they are" and, indeed, what should be expected of them if they take political office. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 6:25 am
Having other lawyers calling for such severance of lawyers and clients does not change its character as a form of mob justice. [read post]
20 May 2017, 6:40 am
The court found that this rule does not apply to defendants who plead guilty and the rule is intended for defendants who go to trial. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 2:37 pm
; Part VI: When is a partial discharge possible, if the debtor is ineligible for a full discharge of their student loans? [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:56 pm
VI; TEX. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 9:51 am
The court stated it believed the same principle should apply to sex-based discrimination, especially because Title IX was modeled upon Title VI. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 9:59 am
CRS then notes several challenges facing any attempt by Congress to regulate nanotechnology: (i) lack of data characterizing nanomaterials; (ii) lack of standardization in nomenclature, metrics, and materials; (iii) proprietary nature of information; (iv) difficulty of communicating among academic disciplines; (v) limited resources; and (vi) possible inadequate statutory authority. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 7:53 am
The amended NC Farm Act does not only affect farmers but also retailers, manufactures, advertisers, and processors. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 10:53 am
How does an individual or business evaluate New York, London or Hong Kong as locations where the ultimate determination of qualification is subjective and will be rendered useless some years from now? [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 7:41 pm
The defendants moved to dismiss for lack of diversity, arguing that Washington was a VI citizen, not a Texas citizen. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 3:42 pm
“She is an accomplished leader and educator who brings an infectious passion and striking problem-solving ability to the work that she does. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 6:19 am
That does not sound like great way to run a “lessons learned” post-action review. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 5:16 am
To avoid any possible clear error and/or manifest injustice, the court will allow Defendants until Tuesday, November 16, 2010 to respond as to: 1) whether the court should reconsider the issue of tolling; and 2) if the court does, whether it committed clear error in application of the appropriate burden of raising or pleading tolling in this context and in granting the motion to dismiss before discovery had yet occurred. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 9:25 am
Lastly, Part VI details the test’s application in Bikindi’s appeal. [read post]
