Search for: "EMPLOYERS DIRECT INSURANCE COMPANY" Results 2401 - 2420 of 3,667
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2013, 10:22 am by Ravi S. Nagi
Attorney Nagi has successfully represented private and public companies in numerous industries, including franchises, hotels, banks, financial service corporations, insurance companies, luxury retailers, restaurant chains, and auto dealerships. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 6:31 am by Joy Waltemath
She further alleged that the CEO had direct responsibility for the supervision of employees and was jointly and severally liable under the FLSA. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 10:11 am by Jamie LaPlante
Despite what the contract language states, if the reality of the arrangement looks and feels like an employer-employee relationship, the company could be liable as a joint employer for discrimination and other employment-related claims. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 12:23 am by Kevin LaCroix
A CEO’s personal relationship arguably might trigger a disclosure obligation when a personal relationship has a clear and direct impact on company performance. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 10:02 am by Eugene Volokh
The Administration therefore set up a system through which certain nonprofits who object to coverage of some or all contraceptives could buy insurance policies that don’t ostensibly cover them, but then the insurers would be obligated to pay for the contraceptives without any charge to the policyholders (or any direct charge to the employers). [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 7:38 pm by Joy Waltemath
The Kennedys believe that they cannot direct their closely held company’s health insurance plan to “provide, fund, or participate in health care insurance that covers artificial contraception, including abortifacient contraception, sterilization, and related education and counseling. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 1:52 pm by Eugene Volokh
And as I understand the college and university exception, it assures employees coverage for the contraceptives through the insurance companies, though with no direct payment for it by the employers; that exception thus wouldn’t implicate either interest. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 9:07 am by Hedge Fund Lawyer
European Union’s Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (“AIFMD”). [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 7:46 am by Eugene Volokh
If the employer is called to the stand and was asked, “Do you think that it is religiously wrong for you to provide this insurance? [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 1:01 am by Jon Gelman
(workers-compensation.blogspot.com)Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rules Exclusivity Doctrine Not a Bar to Asbestos Claim Against an Employer Directly If Late Manifestation (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)John Burton Reports on Workers' Compensation Insurance Industry Underwriting Results (workers-compensation.blogspot.com) [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 6:30 am by Michael B. Stack
Stack, CPA, Director of Operations, Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. is an expert in employer communication systems and part of the Amaxx team helping companies reduce their workers compensation costs by 20% to 50%. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 2:23 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
DiNardo, 174 F.3d 751 (6th Cir. 1999) (applying Tennessee law); Overholt Crop Insurance Service Co. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:30 am by Michael B. Stack
The post Wisconsin-Based Employer Fined Nearly $50,000 appeared first on Reduce Your Workers Compensation Insurance Coverage Costs with Timely Information for Employers | Work Comp Roundup. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 4:10 am by Steven Gursten
This double standard allows insurance companies to use RICO to attack doctors and lawyers, yet injured injured and innocent individuals cannot use RICO to stop insurance company abuse. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm by Anita Ramasastry
Meanwhile, to make things even more complicated, there are new types of companies that have cropped up to compile and catalogue our social-media activities—to be used in new contexts such as insurance applications and employment screening. [read post]