Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE" Results 2401 - 2420 of 7,358
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Anna Price
The article related to fishing rights was a common provision in treaties between the government and American Indian tribes in the Puget Sound region, and became a focal point in United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 1:56 pm by CMS
Candey argued that the liquidators were acting in the capacity of English liquidators as required by the LASPO Order exemption by virtue of the recognition order which was granted in their favour. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 9:27 am by Michael C. Petta
Moreover, unlike the seizure of M/V Wise Honest in 2018, in the present situation, the U.N. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 5:11 am by Henry Oliver
In W (Algeria) (FC) and BB (Algeria) (FC) and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 8 – read judgment  The Supreme Court has made a difficult decision. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 8:58 am by Guest Blogger
Rob WeinerDuring the Supreme Court oral argument in King v. [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 9:33 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Eban Ebai, The right to self-determination and the anglophone Cameroon situationOmer Yousif Elagab, Indicting the Sudanese President by the ICC: Resolution 1593 revisitedSonja Grover, Child rape as a crime against humanity: challenging the United States Supreme Court reasoning in Kennedy v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 5:04 pm by Erin Miller
Bush was the petitioner in Bush v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 2:21 am by Matrix Law
This is an important question because it affects when the limitation period for the bringing of claims (which in English law for torts is normally six years) starts to run. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 2:48 pm by Lawrence Cunningham
The association also challenges the company’s characterization of the association as a “sophisticated” party, observing that all members are foreign and English is a second language for most. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 3:46 pm
 InterDigital v ZTE is case where ZTE is, contrary to their position in the English proceedings, willing to be bound by a licence settled by the US court regardless of validity and infringement being heard later. [read post]