Search for: "English v. English"
Results 2401 - 2420
of 9,841
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2017, 8:58 am
The English Chancery courts have existed for centuries specifically to avoid the bureaucracy and inequity found in other parts of the judicial system and, true to form today, they are not known for letting red tape get in the way of a good monopoly right. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 6:44 am
The Court found that the English courts have jurisdiction in considering and determining the terms of a global FRAND licence. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 2:39 am
The IPKat's friend Carolina Pina (Garrigues Abogados), who coincidentally represented YouTube in the Spanish litigation, has kindly sent him a non-official English translation of the decision, which you can read here. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 5:52 am
" Random House Dictionary of the English Language, 2nd Ed., Unabridged (1987). [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 5:15 pm
This is only the third case in which such a finding has been made – the other two are Pfeifer v Austria (2007) 48 EHRR 175 and Petrina v Romania Judgment of 14 October 2008). [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 8:03 am
(v) if those allegations were justiciable, should the court exercise its jurisdiction be exercised in this case? [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 1:27 am
Tarapore & Co. [(1969) 3 SCC 562)], ONGC v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 5:41 am
The decision in VTB Capital Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am
Coca-Cola’s treatment in Canada v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 7:19 am
In Smith v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 1:32 am
On 23 April 2024, the Court of Appeal handed down its judgment in the appeal arising from the January 2023 decision of Meade J in AIM v Supponor [2023] EWHC 164 (Pat). [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 10:07 am
Mr Mahajna does not speak English. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 12:01 pm
This is the second part of this Kat's analysis on Interdigital v Lenovo FRAND judgment [2023] EWHC 539 (Pat). [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 6:01 pm
"The aforesaid post also neatly summarises the legal position under the English and the Singaporean laws. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 2:34 am
SA v FA also highlights that it can no longer be assumed that an English court will agree that it is the most convenient forum where substantial justice can be obtained. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 2:03 pm
In contrast to CAAF's opinion in Forney, United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 1:35 am
Accordingly, MMGR’s claim that the English courts did not have jurisdiction was rejected by the High Court. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 5:30 am
Introduction On Wednesday 1 Mar and Thursday 2 Mar 2017, the Supreme Court hears the appeal of Nuclear Decommissioning Authority v Energy Solutions EU Ltd. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 2:08 am
On appeal from: [2013] EWCA Civ 322 The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal regarding whether the requirement of an English test for those spouses or civil partners of a British citizen wishing to stay in the UK breached their partner’s rights under the ECHR, art 8, finding that the Rule itself does not infringe art 8, but it invites further submissions from the parties on whether a declaration should be made that the operation of the guidance in its present form is… [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 2:11 pm
Tang v. [read post]
