Search for: "FELTS v. STATE" Results 2401 - 2420 of 5,849
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2010, 11:17 pm by Marta Requejo
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof, Germany, in case C- 256/09 was lodged on 10 July 2009 (see V. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 4:12 pm by NL
It makes a distinct contrast and counterpoint to R (Garbet) v Circle 33 Housing Trust and another [2009] EWHC 3153 (Admin) [our note here]. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 4:12 pm by NL
It makes a distinct contrast and counterpoint to R (Garbet) v Circle 33 Housing Trust and another [2009] EWHC 3153 (Admin) [our note here]. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 9:24 pm
"The way it was approached, my staff and I absolutely felt that our intelligence or ability was always being challenged," Barnes said. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 5:01 am by FT
Arden LJ commented that this would be likely to discourage LLs from extending latitude to introductory tenants who they felt should have another chance to retain their tenancies. [read post]
19 May 2016, 5:30 pm by Rory Little
Meanwhile, modern precedents such as the Court’s 1971 decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 10:50 am by Giles Peaker
 She then instructed solicitors ho made further representations, including that it had been held that the benefits cap “indirectly discriminated against women over men” (citing the Supreme Court decision in R (DA) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2019] UKSC 21, [2019] 1 WLR 3289). [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 9:03 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
This week the Supreme Court of Canada released the decision in Cuthbertson v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 5:27 am
Gomes also testified she felt threatened by Arklie, `the way that he suddenly got up from the table and came at us seemed . . . threatening. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 10:12 am by Rosalind English
Against this background, the judge felt that it would be very difficult to draw hard and fast boundaries between ‘zones’ – whether business or familial in nature. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 8:41 am by Dennis Crouch
Ct. 1367, 1374 (2020), which stated in passing that “the § 315(b)-barred party can join a[n existing IPR] proceeding initiated by another petitioner. [read post]