Search for: "Feltes v. People" Results 2401 - 2420 of 2,981
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2012, 11:05 am
The Court finds that this complaint is also without grounds since there is an adequate number of precedent cases to reflect that , “"'[a]n indictment charging a defendant as a principal is not unlawfully amended by the admission of proof and instruction to the jury that a defendant is additionally charged with acting-in-concert to commit the same crime'" (People v Robinson, 53 AD3d 681, 683-684 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 794 [2008], quoting People… [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 10:43 am by Robert Steele
Moreover, when reading the stories of wrongfully incarcerated individuals such as Alton Logan and Lee Wayne Hunt, see People v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:05 am by Adam Klasfeld
” At its core, Weinstein’s case simply applied the long-established rules of the more than century-old case of People v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
In an early case, Willingham v. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 11:47 pm
Prospective jurors were asked not just how they felt about capital punishment, but also about the law of parties specifically. [read post]
13 Nov 2021, 9:10 pm by Sophia Tang
For example, Boa Barges As v Nanjing Yichun Shipbuilding concerned a dispute worth nearly $50,000,000.[4] The contract originally included a clause to resolve disputes in London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) and to apply English law. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:01 am by Randy E. Barnett
At that time, because I tend to read what relates directly to my current projects, I felt that I was not keeping up with the literature. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 3:50 am by Russ Bensing
”  The opinion cites the 10th District’s decision in State v. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 7:32 pm by Brett Holubeck
Some examples are listed here: In the Friedrichs v. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 3:59 pm by Kirk Jenkins
  The State argues that the only decision directly addressing a possible police powers limitation on the Clause, Felt v. [read post]