Search for: "GRAY v. GRAY"
Results 2401 - 2420
of 2,762
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2020, 9:13 pm
v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 3:48 am
Schecter in Van Horne v Ben-Dov, preliminarily enjoining a freeze-out merger of a close corporation for lack of a valid business purpose. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 2:39 pm
(Daily.2016.Professors) Tristan Gray–Le Coz and Charles Duan, Apply It to the USPTO: Review of the Implementation of Alice v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 7:16 am
He is secretary to Sir Charles Gray’s Committee on an Early Resolution Procedure for libel actions. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in 2012 in Arizona v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 6:30 pm
(Daily.2016.Professors) Tristan Gray–Le Coz and Charles Duan, Apply It to the USPTO: Review of the Implementation of Alice v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm
§ 112, 2nd Paragraph (Patent Docs) Summary of false marking settlements May – December 2010 (GRAY on Claims) Article One announces $25,000 bonus for 2010 (Article One Partners Blog) Should I request ex parte or inter partes reexamination? [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 10:26 am
Gray v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
Journalism and the PCC There are no adjudicated PCC rulings to report, but several “resolved” cases including: Miss Catherine Lemon v Western Daily Press (Clause 1, 20/01/2012); A woman v The People (Clauses 3, 6, 9, 19/01/2012); A woman v Daily Mail (Clauses 3, 6, 9, 19/01/2012); Mr Alan Shannon v Ayr Advertiser (Clause 1, 19/01/2012); Mr Alan Shannon v Sunday Mail (Clause 1, 19/01/2012); Dr Esther Hobson v The Star (Sheffield)… [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), Domain name transfer made easier: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), Quantum of obviousness in Australian patent laws - C Lawson: (IP Down Under), Separating Sony sheep from Grokster (and Kazaa) goats: Reckoning [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Int'l, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc (Gray on Claims) District Court N D Illinois: ‘Consisting of’ and ‘consisting essentially of’ are not substantially identical: Kim v Earthgrains Co. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Int'l, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc (Gray on Claims) District Court N D Illinois: ‘Consisting of’ and ‘consisting essentially of’ are not substantially identical: Kim v Earthgrains Co. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am
See Reynolds v Times Newspapers Limited [2001] 2 AC 127 HL, which created the defence, and Jameel v Wall Street Journal Europe Sprl [2007] 1 AC 359 HL, which revitalised it. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 7:31 am
Bolden v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:31 am
The Times also published an essay by the winner of the Times/One Essex Court Law Awards, James Potts, a pupil at 4-5 Gray’s Inn Square: ‘Cameras in court: justice’s loss or gain? [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am
Resolved cases include: Mr Stephen Wren v Daily Mail (Clause 1), 11/05/2012; A man v The Sun (Clause 1), 11/05/2012; Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 11/05/2012; Ms Louise Pyne v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 08/05/2012. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 5:51 am
The problem is not black-and-white, but involves shades of gray. [read post]
2 Oct 2024, 9:27 am
7502119 STEMVERSITY 7496896 X 7506904 THE TRENCHES SHOW 7499259 PROPER POUR 7492393 FLORAKING 7491976 AM LOGISTICS 7513111 TIDY SPACE PRODUCTS 7492234 PRIME HOSPITALITY GROUP 7492621 HIS PLACE EATERY CHICKEN & WAFFLES RIBS & SOUL FOOD 7506713 AMBETA 7512430 XPONENTIAL INTELLIGENCE PLANNING 7512677 THE TRENCHES SHOW WITH ZAIRE FRANKLIN 7501768 CARD YARD MAGIC 7502718 MORE TO SAY 7491173 CLASS OF BY HERFF JONES 7492618 HIS PLACE 7506902 THE TRENCHES WITH ZAIRE FRANKLIN 7493313 HOMETOWNLX… [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 9:21 am
Gray and others v G-T-P Group Ltd: Re F2G Realisations Ltd (in liquidation) [2010] EWHC 1772 (Ch) held that a charge characterised as a floating charge over financial collateral will only qualify as a floating charge under the Regulations if “legal control” as opposed to “administrative control” of the underlying financial collateral is transferred to the collateral-taker. [read post]
