Search for: "Gray v. Gray"
Results 2401 - 2420
of 2,758
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2012, 6:33 am
Crook, Anderson v. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 11:36 am
(Daily.2016.Professors) Tristan Gray–Le Coz and Charles Duan, Apply It to the USPTO: Review of the Implementation of Alice v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 2:39 pm
(Daily.2016.Professors) Tristan Gray–Le Coz and Charles Duan, Apply It to the USPTO: Review of the Implementation of Alice v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 7:16 am
He is secretary to Sir Charles Gray’s Committee on an Early Resolution Procedure for libel actions. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 6:30 pm
(Daily.2016.Professors) Tristan Gray–Le Coz and Charles Duan, Apply It to the USPTO: Review of the Implementation of Alice v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 10:26 am
Gray v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm
§ 112, 2nd Paragraph (Patent Docs) Summary of false marking settlements May – December 2010 (GRAY on Claims) Article One announces $25,000 bonus for 2010 (Article One Partners Blog) Should I request ex parte or inter partes reexamination? [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
Journalism and the PCC There are no adjudicated PCC rulings to report, but several “resolved” cases including: Miss Catherine Lemon v Western Daily Press (Clause 1, 20/01/2012); A woman v The People (Clauses 3, 6, 9, 19/01/2012); A woman v Daily Mail (Clauses 3, 6, 9, 19/01/2012); Mr Alan Shannon v Ayr Advertiser (Clause 1, 19/01/2012); Mr Alan Shannon v Sunday Mail (Clause 1, 19/01/2012); Dr Esther Hobson v The Star (Sheffield)… [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 7:31 am
Bolden v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), Domain name transfer made easier: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), Quantum of obviousness in Australian patent laws - C Lawson: (IP Down Under), Separating Sony sheep from Grokster (and Kazaa) goats: Reckoning [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Int'l, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc (Gray on Claims) District Court N D Illinois: ‘Consisting of’ and ‘consisting essentially of’ are not substantially identical: Kim v Earthgrains Co. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am
See Reynolds v Times Newspapers Limited [2001] 2 AC 127 HL, which created the defence, and Jameel v Wall Street Journal Europe Sprl [2007] 1 AC 359 HL, which revitalised it. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Int'l, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc (Gray on Claims) District Court N D Illinois: ‘Consisting of’ and ‘consisting essentially of’ are not substantially identical: Kim v Earthgrains Co. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:31 am
The Times also published an essay by the winner of the Times/One Essex Court Law Awards, James Potts, a pupil at 4-5 Gray’s Inn Square: ‘Cameras in court: justice’s loss or gain? [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 4:19 am
In 1981, in Rostker v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 3:18 am
A recent appellate decision, Alam v Uddin, 2018 NY Slip Op 02763 [2d Dept Apr. 25, 2018], involved a rather odd array of apparently conflicting arguments on both sides. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 12:06 pm
.” Following the usual practice in such maritime cases, the city sued the houseboat itself, and the case became known as “City of Riviera Beach v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:36 pm
., Medical Corps, United States Navy – recipient Bronze Star wtih Combat “V” for Valor (OPERATION TORCH – 8 November 1942) (CLICK ABOVE) CASABLANCA 1942 ~~~~~~~~~~ GARDEN OF STONES LISTEN, REFLECT, and PRAY MANSIONS OF THE LORD (Ronan Tynan – click on gray dot with white right pointing arrow next to Ronan’s photo) Minstrel Boy (John McDermott) THE NAVY HYMN ECHO TAPS ~~~~~~~~~~ IN MEMORY OF THE MEN OF USS INDIANAPOLIS (CA – 35) (CLICK… [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 1:36 pm
” Governor Gray Davis signed SB 841 into law on August 2, 2003. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 9:36 am
I would be interested to know what constituents, or indeed anyone, benefited from Susan Kramer MP’s rapid fingers: SusanKramer: Brown looking v smug as listens to budget SusanKramer: 12 mins into budget & nothing significant yet. [read post]
