Search for: "Hill v. United States"
Results 2401 - 2420
of 2,550
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
– Teva’s opposition proceedings regarding IL 130424 to Pfizer: (IP Factor), Thailand: Thai chief drug price negotiator removed from post: (GenericsWeb), Thailand: Compulsory licences cannot be revoked: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), (more from Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), UK: Court of Appeal for England and Wales hands down decision in Boehringer Ingelheim KG and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma KG v Swingward Limited relating to repackaging and… [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 1:52 pm
United Grain Growers Ltd., [1997] 3 S.C.R. 701 for essentially the same conduct that attracted the punitive damage award. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners:… [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 11:20 pm
In a recent 5-3 decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled in the case of Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:03 pm
The decision of the United States District Court forthe Middle District of Alabama in McNair v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 6:28 am
Moreover, "significant possibility" is a relatively new phrase that the United States Supreme Court used in Hill - but in a different context; by [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 2:46 pm
In United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 3:45 am
HEPPT, ESQ., 05 Civ. 9977 (RWS) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK January 16, 2008, Filed , the tide seems to be turning in favor of the defendant attorney. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
Young Moon, appeals from her conviction and sentence entered by the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee on April 25, 2006, for three counts of health care fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 12:36 am
Source: New York State Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), January 15, 2007
For your information we are posting the entire New York Legislature 2007 Chapter Law List as retrieved from the New York Legislative Retrieval System on January 15, 2008. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 3:24 am
Attorney for the State: Joby Jerrells, Indianapolis, IN. 9:45 AM - Brenwick Associates, LLC v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
Legislatures in the United States and abroad have passed increasingly restrictive and intrusive laws in order to protect the public from convicted sexual offenders. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 6:36 am
To take the best-known precedent, after World War II the United States prosecuted German government lawyers in the second round of Nuremberg trials. [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 4:45 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 10:24 am
McAdams, Reforming Entrapment Doctrine in United States v Hollingsworth, 74 U Chi L Rev 1795 (2007) Thomas J. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 9:48 am
There is no danger in this case that defendant will be punished for conduct that is legal where it occurred, because Title VII is a federal law that applies everywhere in the United States.Dukes v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 6:53 am
In NLRB v. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 7:30 am
., a wayback machine entry dated before the critical date, the same evidence is - at this point - unlikely to be admissible in court due to hearsay issues.AFAIK, the wayback machine has overcome hearsay objections in only one case (Telewizja Polska United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 1:05 am
United States Subscription Required
U.S. [read post]
