Search for: "Husband (S) v. Wife (S)" Results 2401 - 2420 of 6,209
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2015, 6:17 am by Eliana Baer
This couple never lived together, they were not financially dependent on one another and they never held themselves out as husband and wife. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 11:10 am by Law Lady
ONE PROGRESS PLAZA, II, LLC, Appellee. 2nd District.Dissolution of marriage -- Equitable distribution -- Stock shares -- Valuation -- Trial court erred in setting value for shares of stock to be transferred from husband to wife without hearing parties' full evidence regarding value and, instead, setting the value at the average between value placed on stock by husband and value placed on stock by wife -- Remand for further proceedingsMICHELLE TUCKER,… [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 6:25 am
Approximately 75 minutes into the call, James Huff returned to his hotel room where his wife, Bertha Huff, awaited him. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 11:31 am by Kollias & Giese, P.C.
In Marriage of Gurda, the husbands committed dissipation by taking marital funds and investing them in a company that became insolvent, without informing his wife. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 6:14 pm by Gregory Forman
On July 22, 2015, three and a half years after the Court of Appeals remanded the family court’s increase in an Ex-Wifes alimony to $1,547.65 per month in the case of Roof v. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 6:16 am
The same could not be said for Huff’s wife, however, as she did not make the call, and did have a reasonable expectation of privacy in her conversation with her husband. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 6:38 am by Joy Waltemath
” But the mere fact that his wife exposed her statements to her husband, aware that he was carrying an “interception-capable device—i.e., an iPhone”—did not displace her expectation of privacy (Huff v. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 6:52 pm
The plaintiff cites but one Connecticut decision--and research has failed to reveal any others--DeGolyer v. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 4:30 pm by Gregory Forman
In Herring-Wilson Wife ran a business, Jeanie’s Home Services, with Husbands assistance. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Finally, the Tax Court upheld the imposition of a section 6662 accuracy-related penalty, pointing out, among other things, that the taxpayer had been advised to seek a tax professional’s opinion but that she did not introduce any evidence that she relied on professional tax advice.In the other case, Muniz v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 1:30 pm by Gregory Forman
Additionally, George and Emily continued to act as husband and wife after the impediment was removed. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 11:38 am by Gregory Forman
On August 29, 1988, the Court of Appeals affirmed an award of rehabilitative alimony over wifes objection in Bryan v. [read post]