Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: T. S." Results 2401 - 2420 of 182,363
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Tim Sitzmann
An interesting aside is that the courts that have addressed the tacking issue also tend to reflect that circuit’s precedent as to whether a likelihood of confusion determination is a question of law or a question of fact. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 1:28 pm
The performers, who don't have any copyright interests, seek such fees for YouTube appearances and/or want the agencies to send DMCA takedowns. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 5:41 am by Grant MacKenzie
If a royalty interest does not have an interest in land, then the rights are only contractual and cannot be enforced against anyone who isn’t a party to the contract. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 5:41 am by Grant MacKenzie
If a royalty interest does not have an interest in land, then the rights are only contractual and cannot be enforced against anyone who isn’t a party to the contract. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 7:15 am by Bill
Interesting comparison: [T]he Hill-Thomas conflagration was the first moment in American history when we collectively, truly grappled with sexual harassment. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:29 am
Lots of women aren't very interesting, whereas breasts have a base level of interestingness. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 9:31 am
”Neil Chantler, Ward’s co-counsel, says it’s “ironic” Oppal accuses Ward of being unprofessional. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 4:01 am by Terry Hart
Behind the music: Why artists mustn’t be drawn into an MP3 site’s legal fight — “Is it in the best interests of musicians to help the founder of an online music locker in his copyright battle with EMI? [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 5:00 am
Here is a LINK to an article that was published on Law.com on June 30, 2023 outlining a Georgia trial court's vacation of a $1.5 million dollar jury verdict in favor of a personal injury plaintiff due to the plaintiff's attorney's social media posts.Makes for an interesting read of a cautionary and expensive tale. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 7:29 am by Glenn Reynolds
WASHINGTON EXAMINER: Here’s what you won’t hear from Obama’s State of the Union address. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
To the extent that the later submissions give a different cause for the missing of the time limit, they have to be disregarded (or be considered as inadmissible, see J 2/86, T 257/07, T 261/07), given that the later submissions were filed after the expiration of the time limit stipulated by R 136(1) and (2). [read post]
21 Apr 2007, 11:43 am by Bjoern Elberling
It's not that there aren't interesting things to blog about, it's simply that we all don't have the time/energy, what with dissertations to write etc.As we don't really see that changing for a couple of months at least, we decided to make it an "official" blog hiatus. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 7:53 am
 The Texas opinion concludes that a lawyer can't counsel a client to undertake that conduct if doing so has no other substantial purpose other than to delay litigation or burden the other party. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 11:14 am
Lots of interesting reading on this beautiful Sunday. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 11:11 am by David C. Scileppi
While Canada may move first on the issue, I should note that the SEC hasn’t let this important issue drop. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 8:15 am by Tom Kane
If that is what you were thinking, it’s time to develop an elevator speech that is far more interesting. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 9:46 am
In the meantime, though, the bright guys over at BrightScope have, and their’s is a very interesting take. [read post]