Search for: "In re C Children"
Results 2401 - 2420
of 2,941
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2014, 5:33 am
This court may not re-weigh the evidence nor substitute its inferences for those drawn by the jury. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 12:49 pm
The final regulations exclude foster children and stepchildren from the definition of dependents for the employer mandate. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 4:42 am
She re-tweeted: `that is ridiculous! [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 7:14 pm
The first, remarks delivered by National Security Advisor Robert C. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:32 pm
Mike Peterson and I work so hard and have been so crazy-busy that if I don't put the invitation out in this article for people to give feedback and encourage me to finish, because I/we tend to get lost in our office's day-to-day crises, we will have trouble completing this so important re-circle back onto this topic. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
Lauderdale Division.Bankruptcy -- Confirmation -- Chapter 13 plan -- Good faith -- Chapter 13 debtors failed to carry their burden to establish confirmation of good faith plan where debtors purchased and financed vehicles shortly before their bankruptcy filings in contemplation of those filings, and then proposed chapter 13 plan which would repay the 910-day car claim at less than contractual interest rates such that plans were not proposed in good faith -- Confirmation denied without prejudice to… [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 8:31 am
Each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes: (a) To ensure that any person whose rights or freedoms as herein recognized are violated shall have an effective remedy, notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity; (b) To ensure that any person claiming such a remedy shall have his right thereto determined by competent judicial, administrative or legislative authorities, or by any other competent authority provided… [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm
The raw dog food re-work in the (redacted) to be made into product. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 6:34 am
It was then re-issued with the new amended ‘removal of locality’ proposal on 15 August. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 2:37 am
The Institute for the Study of War (ISW) is a 501(c)(3) organization and produces strictly non-partisan, non-ideological, fact-based research. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 2:00 am
This process starts by submitting paperwork like Complaints, Notices to Defend and Claim Rights with relevant office/courthouse (or online) using No Fault 3301(c)(1) forms obtained either from there or from the website of courts in PA. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 6:34 am
It was then re-issued with the new amended ‘removal of locality’ proposal on 15 August. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 4:54 am
The Institute for the Study of War (ISW) is a 501(c)(3) organization and produces strictly non-partisan, non-ideological, fact-based research. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 6:42 pm
HOWARD DINNER, D.C., P.A., a/a/o DENISE CHAPMAN, Respondent. 4th District.Civil procedure -- Default on motor vehicle lease -- Summary judgment -- Trial court properly entered summary judgment where there were no issues of material fact -- Remand for correction of scrivener's errorGEORGE C. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 7:21 am
Other grown-ups are welcome to sit in as well, but it’s time for children to be in bed or occupied elsewhere, okay? [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 11:08 am
09, pet. denied Oct 2009)(inmate suit re: contaminated food, dismissal affirmed)09? [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 7:33 pm
It states: “(c) Determining economic dependence. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
" The appellate court said that as it stood, Cox wasn't entitled to rely on safe harbor because it did very little (if anything) even when told about repeat offenders, re-affirming the jury decision that sided with BMG and awarded $25 million against Cox when they found the broadband carrier liable for piracy by its subscribers, even if over turning that decision. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:17 am
C. [read post]
8 May 2011, 12:52 pm
Fair warning: To stay with me, you're going to have to gloss over the committee-consensus-speak and try to hew to the substance. [read post]
