Search for: "In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10"
Results 2401 - 2420
of 5,508
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm
”1 Aside from the granular problems stated above, and recognizing that the proposed amendments would in fact add to the problem astutely noted in the quote above by Lawrence Lessig, there is a global, more systemic conflict at issue within the realm of copyright enforcement litigation deserving mention. [read post]
11 Jan 2025, 5:10 pm
As a matter of jurisprudence, either side makes plausible claims--plausible as a matter of jurisprudence, judged by American standards at least. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 3:06 pm
H032201 In a challenge to a 10-year extension of ordinance drastically restricting development of certain property within city limits (the Density Restriction) on equal protection and takings grounds, dismissal of action is reversed where: 1) under the circumstances of this case, the measure extending the Density Restriction for 10 years gave rise to a new cause of action; and thus, 2) plaintiff's lawsuit was timely. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 12:14 pm
Order 10 Rule 1B. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 9:58 am
Representing Appellee in case S-10-0166 (Plaintiff): Glenn M. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm
The division refused the application on the ground that there was no basis in the original application for the “two-step” setting of the data collection conditions in amended claim 1 (A 123(2) EPC). [read post]
2 May 2014, 12:28 pm
The Second Amendment case Drake v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 5:36 pm
And no, the Missouri appellate court most certainly did not rule GEICO "must cover" that the woman's allegedly related "injuries and losses". [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
Further rules concerning this matter are found in the Decision of the President of the EPO dated 28 April 2011 on the filing of sequence listings (OJ EPO 2011, 372) which has entered into force on June 1, 2011 and which, according to its Article 8, applies to all European patent applications pending on that date. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
The subject-matter defined in claim 1 of the First and Second Auxiliary Requests thus amounts to an intermediate generalization.The appellant argued that the second zone claimed could comprise a first, inner part adapted to correct for aberrations resulting from non-optimal states and a second, outer part adapted to correct for spherical aberrations, such a lens solving the problem posed without a third outer zone being required. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:53 am
As Rule 41(d)(1) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure explains, a federal agent who requests a warrant to search a particular place and seize evidence found there must demonstrate that he/she has probable cause to believe evidence of a crime will be found in the place to be searched and/or the thing(s) to be seized. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:12 am
Gloria’s Ranch’s petition alleged that the lease expired in 2009 due to lack of production in paying quantities and alleged that it suffered damages for lost-leasing opportunities.[10] Gloria’s Ranch amended its petition to include a claim for failure to pay royalties on production in Section 15 (from the unit well drilled by Chesapeake). [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:12 am
Gloria’s Ranch’s petition alleged that the lease expired in 2009 due to lack of production in paying quantities and alleged that it suffered damages for lost-leasing opportunities.[10] Gloria’s Ranch amended its petition to include a claim for failure to pay royalties on production in Section 15 (from the unit well drilled by Chesapeake). [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:12 am
Gloria’s Ranch’s petition alleged that the lease expired in 2009 due to lack of production in paying quantities and alleged that it suffered damages for lost-leasing opportunities.[10] Gloria’s Ranch amended its petition to include a claim for failure to pay royalties on production in Section 15 (from the unit well drilled by Chesapeake). [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:12 am
Gloria’s Ranch’s petition alleged that the lease expired in 2009 due to lack of production in paying quantities and alleged that it suffered damages for lost-leasing opportunities.[10] Gloria’s Ranch amended its petition to include a claim for failure to pay royalties on production in Section 15 (from the unit well drilled by Chesapeake). [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 7:39 am
Owens, 1 S.W.3d 315, 321 (Tex. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 12:53 pm
It is clear that in the amended plaint the prayer is against the defendant, therefore, the prayer is only against defendant no.1 and not against defendant no.2. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 8:46 am
The result is that rule amendments are not expected to be in effect for the 2011 proxy season. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
The judge then went on to outline her ruling in this case, explain [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 4:44 am
Perhaps there is a legal explanation.At 945 So.2d 16( Fla. 2007) (Blog note- this maybe the very first time in over 700 posts we have actually published a cite) The Florida Supreme Court on April 5, 2007 issued an emergency amendment to the rules of Judicial Administration requiring that before a non-criminal record is sealed, the following procedures are followed:1. [read post]
