Search for: "JUSTICE DEPT."
Results 2401 - 2420
of 3,152
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2024, 12:30 pm
Can she sue the Dept. for violating Title VI? [read post]
Rare Partnership Dissolution Decision Applies Deadlock Standard to Dissolution Under Partnership Law
22 Jan 2018, 3:44 am
In Magid, Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Eileen Bransten considered the applicable standards for judicial dissolution – particularly based on deadlock – under Partnership Law § 63. [read post]
16 May 2011, 4:00 am
"The proper parties in interest," Justice Butler adds, "the shareholders, have not been dissolved. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 7:59 am
Dept. of Crim. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 7:53 am
In Segovia v Bushnell, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 2150113 (N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept.) [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 5:45 am
Div., 1st Dept. 2010). [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 12:30 pm
(SCOTUS, per Justice Alito, has since extended the stay.) [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:00 am
Pulmosan Safety Equipment Corp., 52 AD3d 710 (2d Dept 2008), involve outside creditors not affiliated with the corporation. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 3:00 am
., 2011 NY Slip Op 00084 (3d Dept January 6, 2011). [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 3:39 am
Earlier this year Queens County Supreme Court Justice Timothy J. [read post]
23 May 2016, 3:22 am
Likewise, Justice Dickerson wrote: We find the reasoning of the [Massachusetts] Supreme Judicial Court to be sound. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 3:39 am
Earlier this year Queens County Supreme Court Justice Timothy J. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 4:27 am
Justice Bluth granted the customer’s motion. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
Justice Catterson's Majority Opinion The majority opinion, authored by Associate Justice James M. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 8:26 am
Dept. of Social Servs. of Durham Cty., North Carolina, 452 U.S. 18 (1981) (Due process is not a concrete, precisely defined concept, but it “expresses the requirement of ‘fundamental fairness. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 3:30 am
., 143 AD3d 487 [1st Dept 2016] [discussed here]). [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:54 am
Robinson, 178 App Div 724, 729 [1st Dept 1916]). [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 11:22 am
Strack (31 Misc.3d 258 [Sup Ct, Essex County 2011] ), Justice Muller held that the "determination of whether a breakdown of a marriage is irretrievable is a question to be determined by the finder of fact. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 7:12 am
Strack (31 Misc.3d 258 [Sup Ct, Essex County 2011] ), Justice Muller held that the "determination of whether a breakdown of a marriage is irretrievable is a question to be determined by the finder of fact. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 6:01 am
” (163 AD3d 597 [2d Dept 2018]). [read post]
