Search for: "Lay v. Lay" Results 2401 - 2420 of 7,492
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2009, 12:07 pm
  Such has been the fate of U.S. v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am by INFORRM
On the same day, Linden J heard the trial of a preliminary issue in the libel case of Evans v McMahon and Kerr J heard an appeal in the case of Samuels v Laycock. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 1:00 am
  Navigating the Enforcement DirectiveA week before Christmas, the Court of Justice of the EU handed down its judgment in IT Development SAS v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 4:51 am
 This was - in a nutshell - the issue on which the Polish Supreme Court had sought guidance from the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in OTK v SFP, C-367/15.This morning, contrary to the earlier Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston, the CJEU answered in the negative, holding that [para 28] "the fact that Directive 2004/48 does not entail an obligation on the Member States to provide for ‘punitive’ damages cannot be… [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 4:51 am by Kelly
For more information, the lawsuit is Jackson Hewitt Inc v. [read post]
14 Jan 2025, 11:47 am by Eric Goldman
The court lays out its standard: Plaintiffs needed to show that Vimeo employees were aware of facts making it obvious to (a) a person who has no specialized knowledge or (b) a person that Plaintiffs have demonstrated does possess specialized knowledge that: (1) the videos contained copyrighted music;(2) the use of the music was not licensed; and (3) the use did not constitute fair use. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 8:16 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Last week, the Maryland Court of Appeals decided Falls Garden Condominium Association v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
Nowhere is this phenomenon more evident than in the Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 12:55 pm by Jeff Gamso
"And so they did (although repeatedly announcing that they weren't speaking - the in court version of how one is to invoke Miranda rights per Berghuis v. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 11:39 am
You'd think so, but the kind of hits I lay down in this game fall into the Holt v. [read post]