Search for: "Lay v. Lay" Results 2401 - 2420 of 7,590
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2020, 1:00 am
  Navigating the Enforcement DirectiveA week before Christmas, the Court of Justice of the EU handed down its judgment in IT Development SAS v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 12:07 pm
  Such has been the fate of U.S. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Judgment Delivering the judgment on behalf of all members of the Court, Lord Neuberger addressed three issues in relation to the article 10 argument: Whether domestic law should reflect the Strasbourg Court’s decision in MGN v UK (2011) 53 EHRR 5 such as to lay down a general rule that: “where a claim involves restricting the defendant’s freedom of expression, then at least where the defendant is a newspaper or broadcaster, it would … normally infringe the… [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 8:20 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
The law in this regard was summarised by Arnold J in Jarden Consumer Solutions (Europe) Ltd v SEB SA [2014] EWHC 445 (Pat) at [103]: “[103] As Kitchin LJ and Sir Robin Jacob said in their joint judgment in Gedeon  Richter plc v Bayer Pharma AG[2012] EWCA Civ 235, [2013] Bus LR D17 at [61], ‘it is trite law that… the older (from the priority date of a patent under attack) a piece of prior art said to render a patent obvious, the harder it is to show… [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am by INFORRM
On the same day, Linden J heard the trial of a preliminary issue in the libel case of Evans v McMahon and Kerr J heard an appeal in the case of Samuels v Laycock. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:11 am by CMS
Comment Deciding where the balance between certainty and fairness lay in this case split the justices of the Supreme Court in addition to the lower courts on appeal. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 6:03 am by Stephanie Woods, Olswang LLP
The 1976 Act did not lay down general rules of English law and its rules were only applicable to actions under the 1976 Act. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 2:15 am by Matrix Law
In fact, Article 6(1) of the Convention does not lay down any rules on the burden or standard of proof, which are essentially a matter for domestic law. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 8:16 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Last week, the Maryland Court of Appeals decided Falls Garden Condominium Association v. [read post]