Search for: "London v. State"
Results 2401 - 2420
of 4,150
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2012, 12:16 pm
May, R (on the application of) v Birmingham City Council [2012] EWHC 1399 (Admin)When can a Local Authority refuse to accept an application as homeless? [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 5:05 pm
We also learn about interesting new ‘anti-claimant’ legislation in California aiming to stamp out litigation brought to intimidate individuals from speaking out on public issues (a type of claim snappily referred to in the Sunshine State as Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation, or ‘SLAPPs’). [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 12:31 pm
Another group of courts found that the exclusion was ambiguous or required to be interpreted based on history of the exclusion and looked at the presentations of the insurance industry to the various insurance commissioners in the various states “Doer v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 5:46 pm
London is an American trial lawyer from Austin, Texas, who has argued cases throughout the United States, and a novelist. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 1:56 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Rowley, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 1434 (03 July 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Gallarotti v Sebastianelli [2012] EWCA Civ 865 (03 July 2012) Frey & Ors v Labrouche [2012] EWCA Civ 881 (03 July 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Chhabra v West London Mental Health NHS [2012] EWHC 1735 (QB) (01 June 2012) Stych v Dibble & Anor [2012] EWHC 1606 (QB) (14 June 2012) High Court… [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 6:55 am
In particular, this spring alone I spoke at a college media conference in New York City, at the Open Rights Group conference in London, and before the Silicon Valley chapter of the Internet Society, and separately presented a telephonic CLE through the California State Bar IP Section, which at some point should be downloadable as a podcast. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:55 pm
In particular, this spring alone I spoke at a college media conference in New York City, at the Open Rights Group conference in London, and before the Silicon Valley chapter of the Internet Society, and separately presented a telephonic CLE through the California State Bar IP Section, which at some point should be downloadable as a podcast. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 7:13 am
by Guido Westkamp Centre for Commercial Law Studies at Queen Mary, University of London By Katerina Stechova (PhD Candidate), Centre for Commercial Law Studies On 21 June 2012, Advocate General Cruz Villalón delivered his opinion in Case C-173/11: Football Dataco Ltd and Ors v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 12:01 am
City of New London as an example where one side lost the battle, but might have secured the upper hand in the long run. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm
The case of McLaughlin v London Borough of Lambeth was settled just before the commencement of a 20 day trial by Eady J. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 2:00 pm
Ruhul Anam, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (No. 2) [2012] EWHC 1770 (Admin) High Court reviews principles of assessment of damages in unlawful detention cases, rules that 2 years of substantive damages are to be awarded to prisoner. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 3:37 pm
CERTAIN INTERESTED UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO. 328-2037, Appellant, vs. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 2:39 pm
In Raw Films Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 6:37 am
In the recent case of Certain Interested Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 3:20 pm
United States and its progeny Debs v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 5:01 am
So the LL has a discretion as to whether to proceed further.The other case the Court in Stafford considered was Forbes v Lambeth London Borough Council[2003] EWHC 222 (QB). [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:38 pm
He analyses the matter with precision: Spartacus restored scene – starring David Cameron Julian Assange, facing extradition to Sweden to answer questions about his sexual conduct, took refuge in the London embassy of Ecuador on Tuesday evening. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 3:30 am
In Certain Interested Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 11:47 am
GMT/UTC, in London. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 5:30 am
v=QX3qV-… — Nixon Peabody LLP (@NixonPeabodyLLP) May 2, 2012 As you can see, somewhat better engagement. [read post]
