Search for: "MATTER OF C B J B"
Results 2401 - 2420
of 3,062
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2011, 12:02 am
b) Can the manufacture and sale in the UK of a complete kit of parts to assemble a device which falls within a patent claim infringe? [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
If so, did it matter that the Defence post-dated the Claim Form? [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:13 am
C. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
” (c) The Australian Press Council’s 2007 submission to the Minister for Telecommunication 23 April 2007 The APC suggested, albeit in two paragraphs, that a voluntary code of conduct for bloggers could be considered[8]. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 10:58 am
” FDC Act § 505(j)(5)(B)(iii) (emphasis added). [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:33 am
Proportionality must only be considered if the occupier has (a) established that the property is her home within the meaning of Article 8; (b) raised the question of proportionality; and (c) satisfied the court that she has a seriously arguable case of disproportionality [33] 2. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
In addition, the Court noted the significant differences between the constitutional and political contexts of the two countries, societal differences, the different position of the media and the degree to which the courts had left matters for judicial interpretation (at 399). [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm
Highlights this week included: Australian Advisory Council on Intellectual Property releases Final Report on Patentable Subject Matter (Patentology) (ipwars.com) (IP Whiteboard) (IPKat) European Parliament gives go-ahead for enhanced cooperation (EPLAW) (IPKat) (IPKat) (Peter Zura’s 271 Patent Blog) Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you… [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 8:16 pm
I was referred to the decision of Cronin J in Charles & Charles [2007] FamCA 276. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 7:14 am
.-(1) Save as otherwise expressly provided in this Act,-(a) any text, rule or interpretation of Hindu law or any custom or usage as part of that law in force immediately before the commencement of this Act shall cease to have effect with respect to any matter for which provision is made in this Act;(b) any other law in force immediately before the commencement of this Act shall cease to apply to Hindus in so far as it is inconsistent with any of the provisions contained in this… [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 10:40 pm
That approach was adopted by Strickland J in Parker v Parker [2010] FamCA 664 (3 August 2010). [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
But the law treats intention as a matter of fact not only in the criminal courts (where it is a necessary constituent of numerous common offences) but also for the purpose of pleas of justification in libel. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:40 am
”…[288] “Finally, as a matter of principle, I find it difficult to see why it should matter if confusion only arises after the goods have been sold. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm
This submission was based on sub-paragraph VI.E.7.3.3.c) of the 6th edition of the “Case Law” book as far as it is identical to the 5th edition (see sub-paragraph VI.E.6.2.2.c)). [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:19 am
As Griffin J. said in Kendall v. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 8:26 am
-Rose C. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 9:30 pm
J. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 7:52 am
Nicholas J. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 5:35 pm
(CC) The patent information submitted under [FDC Act § 505(b) or (c)] is withdrawn by the holder of the application approved under subsection (b). [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 1:11 pm
The Ministry has carefully re-examined the matter in the context of the emerging trends in the economy and regulatory and accounting practices and has decided that the permission may be granted on a general basis wherever the Board of Directors of the holding company gives its consent and the conditions prescribed are complied with. [read post]
