Search for: "Mark C. Good"
Results 2401 - 2420
of 5,964
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2019, 11:18 am
| Skykick - why does it matter & what could it mean for trade marks? [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 5:24 am
The Board finds that there is a tension between the semantic content of the mark and the goods in question. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 2:42 pm
Michael Arrington counters that this doesn't look so good for Google and that they are going to have to pay-up one way or another... [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 9:43 am
Nicely done, USPTO Examining Attorney Jill C. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 1:45 pm
C. [read post]
6 May 2006, 5:32 pm
The classification of the mark becomes very important in this context because only "famous" marks qualify for protection from dilution under Section 43(c) of the Lanham Act. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 10:02 am
Although, with that said, there is an open question concerning whether a Section 2(c) consent can be revoked. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 6:18 am
(internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 8:07 am
Hills, Esq. and Brian C. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 7:37 am
Mark Kirk (R-Ill.) and Rep. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 8:07 am
Hills, Esq. and Brian C. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:38 am
This fascinating case, otherwise known as Case C-307/10 Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys, was referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) as long ago as 27 May 2010. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 10:47 pm
Censorship exists for the good of the people! [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 10:58 am
There was a line of amateur photographers by the board outside C-10 with Brown’s name on it. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 6:59 am
Employers are well advised to keep good records of the time employees spend performing each duty in a dual job circumstance. [read post]
3 May 2012, 2:01 am
These are the questions referred: "Must Article 12(2) of Commission Regulation ... 874/2004 ... laying down public policy rules concerning the implementation and functions of the .eu Top Level Domain and the principles governing registration be interpreted as meaning that, in a situation where the prior right concerned is a trade mark right, the words 'licensees of prior rights' may refer to a person who has been authorised by the proprietor of the trade mark solely… [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 3:25 am
SkyKick (C-371/18) confirmed that if “objective, relevant and consistent indicia” demonstrate that at the time of filing the application, the trade mark applicant had the intention of “obtaining… an exclusive right for purposes other than those falling within the functions of a trade mark,” this amounts to bad faith. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 10:00 am
There is therefore unlikely to be sufficient similarity between these marks and the signs used by most businesses; Many of the trade marks are for fairly esoteric goods and services and/or specifically include goods relating to “Father Christmas”. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 2:11 pm
Copyright © 2010 Mark Bennett. [read post]
19 May 2010, 7:27 am
Therefore, the Panel finds that such diversionary use of the disputed domain name for Respondent’s own commercial gain does not constitute a bona fide offering of goods or services under Policy ¶ 4(c)(i), or a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the domain name under Policy ¶ 4(c)(iii). [read post]
