Search for: "Matter of G. C. ,"
Results 2401 - 2420
of 4,013
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2013, 6:38 am
Florida Statute § 741.30(5)(c). [read post]
1 May 2013, 12:59 am
The article reviews a judgment of the European Court of Justice (First Chamber) of 6 September 2012 (C-170/11), dealing with the mandatory or non-mandatory character of the European Evidence Regulation. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 8:40 am
The recent judgment of the CJEU in Case C‑616/10, Solvay SA v Honeywell et al. [read post]
27 Apr 2013, 10:19 am
The order can be broad or narrow, and the bill gives the courts wide latitude:9 (1) A protection order may include any of the following provisions that the justice considers necessary or advisable for the protection of the subject:(a) a provision prohibiting the respondent from engaging in cyberbullying;(b) a provision restricting or prohibiting the respondent from, directly or indirectly, communicating with or contacting the subject or a specified person;(c) a provision restricting or… [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:41 pm
LEWIS C. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
The value of OPs is that matters may as a result be clarified and the BoA may ultimately be satisfied that a party’s position is the right one, although it was not so satisfied by the written submissions alone. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
As a matter of fact, this particular approach to novelty only applies to claims directed at the use of a substance or composition for a method within the meaning of A 52(4) EPC 1973 (now A 53(c)).Claim 1 of the main request is drafted according to the model proposed by decision G 6/83, i.e. the use of a substance for the manufacture of a composition intended for a specific use. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 11:00 pm
Godfread filed anti-SLAPP motions explaining the matter even to a dummy like me. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 11:00 pm
Godfread filed anti-SLAPP motions explaining the matter even to a dummy like me. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
This is exactly the approach which the EBA found to be inappropriate and prejudicial to a proper exercise of priority rights (G 2/98 [9]). [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am
The defendent, Rachel Myers, withdrew her allegations unreservedly and apologised to Lady Colthurst “for the distress and embarrassment which this matter caused [the Claimant]. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 10:14 am
You can catch up on the rest of the series here: A is for Annualized Income Installment Method B is for Bad Debt Expense C is for Carpooling D is for Disaster Relief E is for Educational Assistance F is for Fellowships and Scholarships G is for Government Debt H is for Hardship Withdrawal. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 3:48 am
§ 921-1.1 (g) [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
Decision G 1/05 [3.6] states: “Thus in opposition proceedings under A 100(c) it is a ground of revocation that the subject-matter of the European patent granted on a divisional application extends beyond the content of the earlier application as filed. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
The Board also offers us some interesting – and possibly controversial – findings on how to understand certain statements of G 2/98. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 10:47 am
The final matters of concern involved water supply and water quality. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 12:54 pm
Roosevelt and a bull elephant shot at Meru c. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:53 am
In the following guest post, Bruce G. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 9:36 pm
State Bars: If Judge Wright believes that any attorney affiliated with Prenda Law has committed misconduct, he could refer the matter to the state bar of each state in which that attorney is admitted. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 12:15 pm
Not perfect, but better than a C&D. [read post]
