Search for: "People v. Gaines" Results 2401 - 2420 of 4,187
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
(Harvard University Press, 2020), and Jesse Wegman, Let the People Pick the President: The Case for Abolishing the Electoral College (St. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 9:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
  On June 26, 2013, when the Supreme Court decided the case of United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 6:25 pm by Rick
  Now comes section 11301 which (I’ve said this all before) supersedes the laws implemented by the CUA and MMPA because it is an initiative of the people (thus not susceptible to being struck down as a portion of the MMPA was in People v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:38 am by Jennifer González
However, the precise definition of obscenity was unclear, and the Supreme Court would not rule that obscenity was not constitutionally protected speech until Roth v. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 6:29 am
Because it seems to me when people start getting beyond Marbury v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:25 pm by Orin S. Kerr
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of Colorado handed down the first state supreme court case on the law of reverse keyword searches for Google terms: People v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 4:54 am
But the good guys, again through a lot of hard work and inspired argument, were able to gain the upper hand in this area. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm by Kevin Russell and Charles Davis
The court concluded that the veteran border patrol agent “reasonably suspected that a sport-utility-vehicle with California license plates containing six adult males of apparently Hispanic descent was transporting illegal aliens when the driver changed speeds erratically on a slippery road and the passengers appeared nervous and refused to acknowledge the agent’s attempts to gain their attention. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 12:36 am by Orin S. Kerr
  In just the last few months, for example, opionions include People by James v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:02 am by Erin Miller
ACSblog highlights a recent American Constitution Society issue brief on state laws that bar people with criminal records from voting, in light of the Court’s recent call for the views of the Solicitor General in Simmons v. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 4:22 am by SHG
  Or, more accurately, yes, we could, but not after People v. [read post]
According to the motion, Sanger did not remember why he initiated the search, but that he was “concerned about things such as people infiltrating Iowa’s sports team to gain insider information or match fixing. [read post]