Search for: "People v. House"
Results 2401 - 2420
of 11,351
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2016, 5:30 am
Obviously, if a candidate who does not support DAPA and DACA wins the White House, these programs will never see the light of day. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 8:46 am
There is no reason for selecting the five year limitation, which has no relationship to the connection people have to Canada (people living abroad may have close connections, people living in Canada may actually have little) and which is not indicative of the impact of Canadian laws on Canadians, whether living elsewhere or not. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 12:16 pm
See State v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 12:16 pm
See State v. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 2:15 pm
By: Rachel V. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 12:08 pm
California, United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 2:59 pm
That’s ground 2, Schedule 2, Housing Act 1985. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 2:55 am
August 16, 2011): The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated .... [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 4:40 am
People v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm
You can read the judgments at first instance, in the High Court (Tickle v Griffiths [2021] EWHC 3365 (Fam)) and from the Court of Appeal (Griffiths v Tickle [2021] EWCA Civ 1882) here. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 4:55 am
As Wikipedia notes, the amendment states that [t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.[ [emphasis added]. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 5:13 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 6:57 pm
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice dismissed a motion for an injunction on exactly this issue recently, in Black et al. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2025, 4:37 pm
This came before Collins Rice J on 12 March 2025, with judgment handed down on 14 April 2025 (Bridgen v Hancock [2025] EWHC 926 (KB)). [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 8:38 am
The rule protects both the police and the people inside the residence. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court next term of Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 4:09 pm
The article was published on the same day that Mr Zahawi had commented negatively on the Iranian nuclear deal in the House of Commons. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 10:09 am
The Fourth Amendment protects the “right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
29 Aug 2006, 3:25 am
The house must be tidy. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 2:21 pm
In People v. [read post]
