Search for: "People v. Superior Court" Results 2401 - 2420 of 3,635
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2012, 7:19 am by admin
The whole idea wearies me The Superior Court for Middlesex County held that under the decision of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court in Flynn v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 12:19 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Intervening in Scoppola v Italy No. 3, Grieve made a further statement indicative of this plan for reform of the Court. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 8:33 am by Lisa Guerin
Last week, the California Supreme Court issued a long-awaited decision in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 8:27 am by Lara
 I’m surprised that people decide the potential revenue is worth the risk. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 10:34 pm by Georgialee Lang
It is noteworthy that the Court in R.E.Q. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 4:37 am
Citing the 1803 landmark case of Marbury v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:29 am by admin
  A few months after the adoption of Escondido’s rent control ordinance, they filed suit in San Diego County Superior Court. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 8:54 pm by David Kopel
The Court fulfilled this duty in cases such as Hylton v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:08 pm by Ilona Bray
Stanko, Los Angeles County Superior Court Limited Jurisdiction, Case No. 11U04495, March 7, 2012. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 11:04 am by Sheldon Toplitt
BC481858) filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court last week, an actress/model sued the maker of Belvedere Vodka for negligent infliction of emotional distress and misappropriation of likeness [Cal. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
By making it unlawful to help others commit unlawful acts, we deter people from doing so. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 7:02 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
As the Pennsylvania Superior Court said years ago, “The Crimes Code nowhere defines this duty,” Commonwealth v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 4:23 am
One case where the Court has shared its insight into the foundation of a larceny crime as it pertains to "owner" was People v. [read post]