Search for: "Petition of United States"
Results 2401 - 2420
of 23,961
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2011, 4:43 pm
The USCIS wants to encourage entrepeneurs to invest and open new business' in the United States. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 9:07 am
John's United Church of Christ, et al. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 12:45 pm
Nor has the language of various Indian treaties, like those between the Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe and the United States, changed; they continue to recognize the Tribe’s authority to exclude non-members. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 4:21 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 8:21 am
USCIS "Because of a consular officer’s suspicions over a $900 payment, two children have spent the last seven years in a Liberian orphanage instead of with their adoptive parents in the United States. [read post]
20 Aug 2005, 1:18 pm
Upon checking the docket for United States v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:00 am
Supreme Court invited the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in Bank of America, N.A. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2006, 6:52 pm
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Hein v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:33 am
CASE: Marriage-Based Adjustment of Status CLIENT: Saudi Arabian LOCATION: Salt Lake City, UT Our client came to the United States from Saudi Arabia with a F-1 student visa to study. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 6:23 am
Department of Labor that is valid for the entire employment period stated on the petition.The petitioner must also indicate an employment start date before October 1, 2009.Petitions received on or after Oct. 1, 2009, and/or requesting a starting date on or after October 1, 2009, will be considered towards the fiscal year 2010 H-2B cap and are subject to all eligibility requirements for fiscal year 2010 H-2B filings, including 8 CFR 214.2(h)(6)(iv)(D), which requires that the start… [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 5:17 pm
The petitioned-for unit is comprised of all drivers, both city and road, but excludes all dockworkers. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 8:00 pm
This edition of “Petitions to watch” features petitions raising issues that Tom has determined to have a reasonable chance of being granted, although we post them here without consideration of whether they present appropriate vehicles in which to decide those issues. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 4:47 pm
Every year over 300,000 patent applications are filed in the United States Patent Office. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 7:13 am
On November 10, 2015, the employer in a high-profile whistleblower-retaliation case [1] advised the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit that it “will not be pursuing a petition for writ of certiorari with the Supreme Court of the United States” with respect to the appellate court’s recent pro-whistleblower decision concerning the scope of the anti-retaliation provisions contained in Section 21F of the Dodd-Frank… [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 2:15 pm
The United States Supreme Court has held that the analogous provision of the First Amendment does not include a right to a response. [read post]
6 May 2013, 10:04 am
Woodley, 751 F.2d 1008, 1012-1013 (9th Cir. 1985) (en banc), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 (1986), and United States v. [read post]
10 May 2007, 2:29 pm
In the Federal Tort Claims Act, Congress waived the sovereign immunity of the United States (and thus created the possibility of damages) for the "negligent or wrongful act or omission of any employee of the Government while acting within the scope of his office or employment, under circumstances where the United States, if a private person, would be liable to the claimant in accordance with the law of the place where the act or omission occurred. [read post]
20 May 2024, 12:00 am
When it comes to immigrating to the United States, there are various pathways and processes that individuals must navigate. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 4:49 pm
Earlier today, the United States Supreme Court in an eight to one vote blocked the public release of documents showing names and contact information of Washington Referendum Measure No. 71 (“R-71”) petition signers. [read post]
