Search for: "Quick v. State"
Results 2401 - 2420
of 4,944
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2023, 9:16 pm
Based on my quick read, I am inclined to agree with Justice Barrett's dissent. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 12:50 pm
First, such an exception is at odds with the policy reasons why 48 states (and DC and Puerto Rico) follow the learned intermediary rule. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 7:00 am
First, a quick recap for those not familiar with the case. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
In the criminal case United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 5:03 am
Civil Code 1466, Mountain Home v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 7:29 am
United States, 11-7650, Bagu v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 9:00 am
" Davis v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 3:44 pm
Procedural fairness and the Penalties Regulation: R(Roche) v Secretary of State for HealthEibhlin Vardy brings us the second report covering the recent Monckton Chambers' seminar. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 9:01 am
Kelley v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 8:05 pm
Schad, 12-1084, previously relisted twice (that’s quick work for a summary reversal). [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:25 am
Judgment was reserved There was also a PTR in the case of Fly Me Now Ltd v Quick Air Jet Ltd. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 7:34 am
” Some state laws serving a distinct interest, such as those regarding libel and fraud, may pose a hindrance to the full exercise of the rights afforded under copyright law but do not conflict with the purpose and objective of the Copyright Act; thus, these laws are not preempted by the Copyright Act.Atticus wants the top perchbut he was preempted by EchoIn Bonito Boats v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 3:38 pm
The Ninth Circuit swung mightily and missed with McClellan v. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 8:00 am
Detention: In Ali v. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 6:11 am
The Case of Padilla v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 5:40 am
The search returned a list of 51 citations, including one of the leading cases on the issue: W&O Construction v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 3:55 am
They provide a lot of insight into the workings over at the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 9:32 pm
Wiley, of course, interpreted "lawfully made under this title" to mean "lawfully made in the United States". [read post]
