Search for: "STATE v BURNS" Results 2401 - 2420 of 3,333
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2011, 10:57 am by Danielle Citron
Today, March 24, is the centennial of the date on which the New York Court of Appeals issued its opinion in Ives v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 2:53 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
A defendant is charged with felony child abuse under Mississippi Code Section 97-5-39(2)(a), which states: Any person who shall intentionally (I) burn any child, (ii) torture any child or, (iii) except in self-defense or in order to prevent bodily harm... [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:03 am
A vehicle under this arrangement is known as a "non-owned" auto and, as the plaintiff in Burns v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 9:42 am by Ann Carlson
What is especially interesting about the court case, Associated Irritated Residents v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:33 am by Susan Brenner
Miller knew how to transfer files to a thumb drive, create folders on the drive, and burn files from the drive onto a CD. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 5:03 pm by rhapsodyinbooks
State-imposed racial segregation was upheld in Plessy v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:55 am
 Here I take no position on whether recent protect-the-speech-we-hate decisions like United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
")The Clash - "Guns on the Roof" ("Sue the lawyers and burn all the papers / Unlock the key of the legal papers / A jury of a billion faces / Shouted out condemned out of hand. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 11:58 pm by Melina Padron
In the courts CPS -v- Mohammad Razaul Haque and Emdadur Choudhury Two men who burnt poppies and chanted “British soldiers burn in hell” were found guilty of public order offences. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
I have recently dealt in detail with the position under the English law in comparison to the stronger protections in the United States. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 1:31 am by Adam Wagner
Updated | CPS -v- Mohammad Razaul Haque and Emdadur Choudhury – Read judgment A man has  been found guilty of public order offences for burning poppies and chanting “British soldiers burn in hell” on Remembrance Day. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 8:08 am by Steve Hall
Justice Ginsburg added that a 2009 decision, District Attorney’s Office v. [read post]