Search for: "STATE v. JACKSON"
Results 2401 - 2420
of 6,526
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2014, 1:26 am
Jackson LJ accepted the force of the minority position in Din but nevertheless “… loyally accept[ed] the decision of the majority as stating the law under the 1977 Act”. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 4:30 pm
The Wilson appellate distinguished the effect of Family Code section 3651 from the trial court's equitable jurisdiction to forever stay enforcement of the arrears, citing Jackson v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 4:33 am
A recent Illinois case is exemplary of the kind of legal interpretation that drives employers and their insurance companies nuts, because there seems to be an illogical detachment from reality, even though legally justifiable.At issue in Jackson Park Hospital v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am
It is established in Strasbourg and domestic jurisprudence that in certain “well-defined circumstances” art 2 will impose “a positive obligation on [state] authorities to take preventative operational measure” to protect the life of an individual (Osman v UK (2009) 29 EHRR 245 at 115). [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 8:55 pm
After both had completed a course on Linguistic Analysis of Legal Texts at the GSU College of Law, they conducted independent research during the Spring 2022 semester prompted by the question posed by Justice Samuel Alito on December 1, 2021, at oral argument in Dobbs v Jackson’s Women’s Health: “[C]an it be said that the right to abortion is deeply rooted in the history and traditions of the American people? [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 8:14 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 2:31 pm
Bd. of Commrs. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 4:32 am
In 1954, in Brown v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:48 pm
As Justice Antonin Scalia wrote in United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 11:37 am
Save Jobs USA v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 12:49 pm
If the petitioners were bound to lose simply by virtue of being non-citizens detained outside the territorial United States, over half of Jackson's opinion was totally irrelevant and unnecessary. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 12:00 pm
Jackson Women’s Health Organization. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 1:34 pm
Title: Maples v. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 5:20 pm
” Barney argued that the court, in United States v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 10:13 am
Mesnick draws its reasoning from Jackson v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 9:39 am
Labrador v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 3:19 am
” Other decisions in which a public employee's right to free speech was considered include Tytor v Laramie County School District, CA10 [unpublished]; Jeffries v Harleston, CA2, 52 F3d 9; and Barnard v Jackson County, CA8, 43 F3d 1218. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 7:47 am
The US Supreme Court Wednesday heard oral arguments in Perez v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 6:37 am
The court’s decision in Jones v. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm
Moreover, at least three important precedents--United States v. [read post]