Search for: "Sharp v. State" Results 2401 - 2420 of 2,518
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2025, 9:48 am by INFORRM
  Critics of Truss might point to, amongst of things, the sharp rise in mortgage costs and inflation. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 3:19 am
  It is meant to suggest the state of the global human rights project, its challenges and trajectories, and to itemize activities in states that suggest reason for "optimism" or "concern. [read post]
28 Jan 2025, 6:57 am by Adam Cox
Indeed, Roberts relied heavily on Justice Robert Jackson’s concurring opinion in Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 1:21 pm by Unknown
Some state laws on this may also have to be addressed.Why are 11 of 26 biosimilars approved not actively marketed in the US? [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:07 am by Marty Lederman
(The United States is not a State Party to the treaty, but most European nations are, including the UK, France, and Germany.) [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
  The three most recent full trials are Hughes v Risbridger (2010 EWHC 491 (QB)) Berezovsky v Russian Television (10 March 2010 EWHC 476 (QB)) and Gary Flood v Times Newspapers (16 October 2009 EWHC 2375 (QB)). [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Jeffrey Morris
Although only briefly in private practice, Weinstein did serve as a member of the legendary team of attorneys who worked on the appeal to the Supreme Court of Brown v. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 5:47 pm by INFORRM
In Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) Tugendhat J referred to the judgment of the House of Lords in Sim v Stretch ([1936] 2 All ER 1237) and to the judgment of Sharp J in Ecclestone v Telegraph Media Group Ltd ([2009] EWHC 2779 (QB)) and held that, “whatever definition of ‘defamatory’ is adopted, it must include a qualification or threshold of seriousness, so as to exclude trivial claims” [89]. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 7:52 pm by Larry Catá Backer
Jindal Global University; Formerly Professor and Dean, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, India Enforcing Socio-Economic Rights through Public Interest Litigation: An Overview of the Indian Experience 3) Dr Leïla Choukroune, Senior Lecturer in International Economic Law, Faculty of Law, Maastricht University, The Netherlands The Paradox of Justiciability: Labour PIL in China and India Questions/Comments 6:30pm-8:30pm – Welcome Dinner hosted by the City University Law School (by… [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”  Take, for example, his statement that Burwell v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 1:20 am by Florian Mueller
For one example, let me refer you to Philip Elmer-Dewitt's article on how I was right and mainstream media were wrong on the March 1, 2013 Apple v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 1:46 pm by Shelby Everest
Those two worlds, that of the discrete private dealer and the hurly-burly of the art world capital markets, came into sharp legal contrast in late December 2013 with the federal jury trial in Marguerite Hoffman v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 2:26 pm
Collectively, they make a compelling case for change.In Shaw v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
Poor Gary Flitcroft was something of a standard bearer when he sought his injunction in A v B almost a decade ago. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 1:46 pm by Shelby Everest
Those two worlds, that of the discrete private dealer and the hurly-burly of the art world capital markets, came into sharp legal contrast in late December 2013 with the federal jury trial in Marguerite Hoffman v. [read post]