Search for: "Short v. United States" Results 2401 - 2420 of 10,138
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2011, 8:29 am by Douglas Melcher
In particular, it has looked to and applied the relatively liberal pleading standard adopted by the United States Supreme Court in Conley v. [read post]
22 Sep 2004, 10:41 am
However, I was ignoring (for a moment) the unlawful practice (I said practice - NOT policy) that the Bureau is still intent on relying on, because of the stated facts: short sentence and (in the other client's case) health issues. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
A Short History of State RFRAs The first, federal RFRA, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, was passed by Congress to trump the Supreme Court’s decision in Employment Div. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 3:58 am
The inventor's views and corresponding documents may be used to try and define claim scope, obviousness, novelty, and the state of the art. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 6:15 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Twitter has received a lot of public attention recently, most notably for banning the President of the United States from using the platform. [read post]
3 May 2012, 7:06 am by Rosalind English
After a local psychiatric intensive care unit had informed the police that it would not be able to admit Mr S., efforts were made on the same day to place him in a clinic with a medium secure unit. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 4:15 pm by Victoria VanBuren
” A divided United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit narrowly construed the arbitration clause to exclude Jones’s claim. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
Judge Garland is also the “short list” candidate to replace Justice Stevens who is least likely to prompt a polarizing confirmation fight. [read post]
For those employers that might wish to consider ADR, the Supreme Court of the United States has issued a series of decisions in five major cases, providing a road map. [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 6:42 am
(That is not a reason to think that Brown was a mistake: it is simply a consequence of how judicial protection of controversial rights claims usually works in the United States.).Lawrence v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 11:00 pm by Rosalind English
In these conjoined appeals the appellants challenged decisions upholding the secretary of state’s refusal to grant them indefinite leave to remain in the United Kingdom. [read post]