Search for: "Smith v. People"
Results 2401 - 2420
of 3,478
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2022, 3:45 am
Tobacco Tax Differentials Incentivize Smuggling People respond to incentives. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Smith, No. 06-3112 In a case addressing the constitutionality of a vehicle impoundment under the Fourth Amendment in circumstances in which there was no standardized policy regarding the impoundment and towing of vehicles, the circuit court rules that the constitutionality of a community caretaking impoundment is judged by directly applying the Fourth Amendment, which protects people against "unreasonable" searches and seizures. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 3:46 am
Especially when you can come up with one like this for the case of Washington v. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm
I was lead counsel in Rasul v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
Briefly, courts have adopted the learned intermediary rule because:Warnings go to physicians because they are the only people who know both a particular patient’s medical history as well as the risk/benefit profile of the drug/device being prescribed.Limiting warning duties to physicians makes the common law consistent with warning duties imposed by the FDA.Routing prescription drug/device information through the doctor preserves the physician/patient relationship from outside… [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 9:16 am
Philips v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 11:29 am
Smith-Green Mortuary Sciences College Student Disciplined for Threatening Facebook Posts–Tatro v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:57 am
" Smith v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 11:02 am
Tex. 1996); Smith v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 11:51 am
Smith (1879), 11 Ch. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 4:18 pm
Bullough details the criticism this incident received in Angola, where more than half the people live in poverty. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
” (R. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 7:04 pm
Mark Smith put that argument to rest in Attention Originalists. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
(Class 46) Poland Reputation's rating (Class 46) Polish patent attorneys’ professionalism (Class 46) South Africa Orange miniskirt debacle less filling (Patent Baristas) (Class 46) Spain Supreme Court rules on marks consisting of colours ‘per se’ (Class 46) Tunisia Tunisia lines up for copyright training (Afro-IP) United Kingdom EWHC: KCI negative pressure patent valid and infringed: KCI Licensing Inc and others v… [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm
If so … (Class 46) Poland Reputation’s rating (Class 46) Polish patent attorneys’ professionalism (Class 46) South Africa Orange miniskirt debacle less filling (Patent Baristas) (Class 46) Spain Supreme Court rules on marks consisting of colours ‘per se’ (Class 46) Tunisia Tunisia lines up for copyright training (Afro-IP) United Kingdom EWHC: KCI negative pressure patent valid and infringed: KCI Licensing Inc and others v Smith… [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 1:34 pm
”); People v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 5:06 am
B.J.F., 491 U.S. 524 (1989) and Smith v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 10:49 am
Co., 499 F.3d 419 (5th Cir. 2007), Corban v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
Most pertinently, the court cites Smith v. [read post]