Search for: "Stark v. Stark"
Results 2401 - 2420
of 2,491
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2020, 8:34 am
State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
The Bradford Hill Predicate: Ruling Out Random and Systematic Error In two recent posts, I spent some time discussing a recent law review, which had some important things to say about specific causation.[1] One of several points from which I dissented was the article’s argument that Sir Austin Bradford Hill had not made explicit that ruling out random and systematic error was required before assessing his nine “viewpoints” on whether an association was causal. [read post]
29 Aug 2021, 7:16 am
“ Tzystuck v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 9:58 pm
Accordingly, Coix filed the Coix Health, LLC v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 5:54 pm
The new case — Staub v. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 7:53 pm
As but one example of the concerns to which I refer, Ceci and Bruck, presenting the Amicus Brief for the case of State of New Jersey v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 8:05 am
This long-needed impetus stems from the recent Supreme Court of Canada case of R. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:06 am
Implications for Commercial Anti-Bribery Laws"; Philip Nichols, University of Pennsylvania, "An International Norm for Corporate Criminal Liability for Bribery"; and Karen Halverson Cross (right), John Marshall-Chicago, "Arbitration of Mass Sovereign Debt Claims: Abaclat v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 4:21 pm
With one justice not participating, the Court issued what is called a per curiam decision (not signed by any justice as author, but issued by the court as a body) in the case of Ganim v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 6:09 am
Structural Shifts: concomitant widespread elimination of (i) supermajority voting requirements, (ii) staggered or classified board terms, and (iii) stockholder rights plans (often done to avoid or compromise likely stockholder proposals), accompanied by limitations on (iv) change-in-control executive severance agreements, along with (v) increased stockholder rights to call special stockholder meetings, in tandem with (vi) highly publicized proposals advocating multiflavored… [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 2:02 pm
(Citizens United itself overruled a 20-year old precedent, Austin v. [read post]
8 Oct 2006, 1:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:00 am
Court of Session Judge Lord Drummond Young rules lawyer had his ‘human rights’ breached by Law Society over complaint row. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 7:17 am
Below you will find the UCP affiliates for Ohio: UCP of Greater Cleveland 10011 Euclid Avenue Cleveland, OH 44106 Phone: (216) 791-8363 Fax: (216) 721-3372 E-mail: sdean@ucpcleveland.org Web: http://www.ucpcleveland.org UCP of Cincinnati 3601 Victory Parkway Cincinnati, OH 45229 Phone: (513) 221-4606 Fax: (513) 872-5262 E-mail: ucpcrend@one.net Web: http://www.ucp-cincinnati.org UCP of Central Ohio 440 Industrial Mile Road Columbus, OH 43228-2411 Phone: (614) 279-0109; (800) 670-9146 (Toll Free)… [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:50 am
John Stark Reed Readers undoubtedly are aware of the recent outbreak of ransomware incidents and the problems they present. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 5:00 am
Brown v. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 7:17 am
See Barnes v. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 6:24 pm
(discussing the doctrine of foreign equivalents in the context of denying registration for geographically deceptively misdescriptive marks); see also Palm Bay Imports v. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 7:30 pm
Climate change is the single greatest existential threat facing Canada. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 8:19 am
Moore Lincoln Boulevard, PO Box 249 Shawneetown, Illinois 62984-0249 Phone: 618/269-3140 Fax: 618/269-4324 Greene V. [read post]
