Search for: "State v. Pounds" Results 2401 - 2420 of 3,059
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2011, 4:10 pm by Dean Gonsowski
” The authors correctly state: “[h]ard decisions need to be made, and resources committed, but an ounce of current prevention now may certainly outweigh the inevitable pound of information loss. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 9:39 am by Legal Beagle
It was also revealed the case against the anti abuse campaigner ranked as Scotland’s most expensive ever Breach of the Peace trial which saw a record HALF A MILLION POUNDS spent on the investigation & trial of Mr Green, a case which tunnelled through the Scottish Courts system for over two years at huge cost to taxpayers. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 2:52 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s March 2018 entry of its opinion in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
 He points out that the magazine is believed to have made £1.7m from the story and that the vedict is unlikely to prevent privacy intrusion in the future. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 5:39 pm by INFORRM
  Well into his stride Tugendhat stated that “no case of public interest had been advanced before herself. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am by INFORRM
She was awarded over £80,000 in damages to cover her financial losses as a result of her subsequent unemployment, plus costs. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 7:17 am by Eric Goldman
For every negative thing the author states, another poster could state the opposite with equal conviction and neither would be a provable fact. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
  First, there is the Sheriff’s Court case of Sinclair or Fraser v Fraser (16 July 2010) in which Sheriff Margaret Neilson awarded damages of £5,000 in respect of oral defamatory statements by the defender about the pursuer, who had been a co-worker with Leonard Cheshire Disability. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
  Colombia Colombian trade marks just got a little slower (IP tango)   Croatia Simplified process for renewing customs watch applications, from 1 January 2009 (Class 46)   Europe European Court of Justice rules on genuine use in Austrian charity reference: Verein Radetzky-Orden v Bundesvereinigung Kameradschaft ‘Feldmarschall Radetzky’ (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI decides BARBARA BECKER confusingly similar to earlier Community trade mark BECKER… [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 1:44 am by INFORRM
The ICO has also fine two companies a total of £290,000 for making millions of nuisance phone calls. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 12:57 pm by INFORRM
Hannon v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2015] EMLR 1, Richard v BBC [2019] Ch 169 and Sicri v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2021] 4 WLR 9). [read post]
31 May 2010, 10:10 pm by INFORRM
This may significantly impact on privacy laws across all Europe’s contracting states. [read post]
1 May 2008, 11:21 am
Surely that would be the end.But no.Back in the same federal district court that had been willing to let the original Hamilton case go forward, the City of New York picked up the fallen public nuisance standard, even though the New York state courts had told the state government (which usually brings nuisance actions) to, in effect, pound sand. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by Julia Englebert
This technicality has led to cases as absurd-sounding as United States of America v. [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
United States The New York Law Journal reports that a libel claim filed [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:31 am
Article 8 (family life): Reliance was placed by Counsel for Mr O'Dwyer on observations on Article 8 in Bermingham & others v USA [2006] EWHC 200 (Admin) where Laws LJ stated (at [121]) that:'I do not accept (the US) submission that the possibility of trial in the United Kingdom is legally irrelevant. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 5:01 am by INFORRM
O’Brien had paid IR£30,000 to former minister, Ray Burke. [read post]