Search for: "State v. Price"
Results 2401 - 2420
of 11,955
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2015, 9:59 am
” * Sacchi v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 8:14 am
--Court: United States District Court for the Western District of KentuckyOpinion Date: 12/17/09Cite: Carrier Vibrating Equipment, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 8:55 am
Of course, there is still that pesky little confusion test for Gucci, which in the Second Circuit is the Polaroid Crop v Polarad Elecs Corp (1961) test (see test here as applied to another famous shoe battle, Louboutin v YSL). [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 10:28 am
Rothstein realized the benefit of the bargain, by getting season tickets for a considerably cheaper price than he would have been able to if the resort knew he wasn't going to honor his end of the bargain. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 9:56 am
Supreme Court held in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
RUEDA, Appellant V. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 10:43 am
” Kasky v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 9:01 pm
Nemier v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 8:16 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:58 pm
For nine Californian jurors from the state which launched Apple and who, like the rest of the American populus, have most likely been indoctrinated into coveting American Apple products in preference to those of the South Korean Samsung, perhaps a finding of rampant infringement with a $1.05 billion damages price-tag just "felt right" – but it doesn't mean that it is just or correct. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 3:08 pm
The oral argument thus renewed the mystery of why the Court granted certiorari in the first place--especially after it had denied the petition in Elane Photography, LLC v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 7:24 am
In the case of Sullivan v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 5:00 pm
In Klein v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 12:38 pm
To defray these costs, companies may raise prices, limit hours, or relocate work to other states and countries. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 7:22 am
Williams-Sonoma, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 7:31 am
The plaintiffs sued Porsche for allegedly manipulating the price of VW stock in Germany and for allegedly misrepresenting Porsche’s intentions concerning takeover of VW. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 11:41 am
However, the price of being permanently "connected" via your cell phone may just be your privacy. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
., et al. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 6:09 pm
Innovator v Innovator - does this matter where injunctions are concerned? [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:51 am
In FTC v. [read post]
