Search for: "State v. Waters" Results 2401 - 2420 of 9,937
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2016, 1:11 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Courts of Appeals Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/cta/2016cta.htmlUnited States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Resolving the issue of whether the plaintiff is entitled to retirement health benefits "requires examination of the relevant . . . plan documents" (Matter of Parrino v Albertson Water Dist., 118 AD3d 802, 802; see Matter of Consolidated Mut. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Resolving the issue of whether the plaintiff is entitled to retirement health benefits "requires examination of the relevant . . . plan documents" (Matter of Parrino v Albertson Water Dist., 118 AD3d 802, 802; see Matter of Consolidated Mut. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 12:50 pm by Conor McEvily
Today’s first petition of the day is: Title: Daugaard v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 10:10 am
Live alone, in the middle of the desert, with no electricity, water, or toilets? [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 6:19 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
United States, in which a divided Court held (for the second time) that federal regulations promulgated by the U.S. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am by MOTP
At some point UTSW began experiencing water penetration in the building's concrete foundation and installed ceramic floor tiles because of the moisture problems. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 7:31 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
 In the post United States v Windsor marriage jurisprudence, couples are challenging state constitutional bans on gay marriage by metes and bounds. [read post]
13 May 2010, 10:50 pm by Mark Murakami
The outer continental shelf is comprised of “all submerged lands lying seaward and outside of the area of lands beneath navigable waters”—that is, submerged lands lying outside the territorial jurisdiction of the states. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:07 pm by Keith B. Hall
  The EPA's retreat appears to have been prompted by the Supreme Court's unanimous decision against the Agency the week before in Sackett v. [read post]