Search for: "Strange v. Strange"
Results 2401 - 2420
of 3,726
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2017, 7:04 pm
State v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:33 pm
The decision in question is Case C‑534/10 P Brookfield New Zealand Ltd, Elaris SNC v Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO), Schniga GmbH. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 8:00 am
Bolton has also referred to federal campaign finance laws as an “overreact[ion]” to Watergate, and fought against them as counsel for the petitioners in Buckley v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 2:02 pm
Related Issues: PrivacyNational Security LettersNSA SpyingRelated Cases: Twitter v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 4:30 am
In Chapman v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 6:24 pm
” United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 8:13 am
Miri, who like many readers is an IP enthusiast but not a patent specialist, reflects the concerns of many people who find themselves floating in that strange position of being somewhere between a layman and an expert. [read post]
22 May 2014, 2:39 pm
And, strangely enough, the proposed move has caused an outcry in New York City. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 4:00 am
To the contrary, this is a clarifying moment, when we will see 43 years after United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 12:56 pm
The ongoing Qualcomm v. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 6:42 am
The bill strangely proposes a preposterous process of certification under S.5. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
In American Legion v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 1:40 pm
Granted, this is not a normal case, but a decision invalidating this most recent proclamation will look strange to a law student reading the decision in a casebook 25 years from now. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 11:12 am
Sabrina McCubbin summarized pre-trial motions in Smith v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 4:30 am
In Florida v. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 1:21 pm
"McLaughlin v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 6:30 am
Supreme Court case Pierce v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 8:45 am
Last week, the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 9:34 am
The lawsuit, Jensen v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 1:59 pm
Ironically, the senators and representatives supporting the EATS Act have put themselves in the strange position of undermining the interests of their own states and the nation as a whole. [read post]
