Search for: "The People v. Johnson" Results 2401 - 2420 of 2,452
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2022, 10:23 am by David Kopel
On May 14, a criminal with an AR rifle had murdered 10 people at a supermarket in Buffalo. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm by Josh Blackman
[Professor Shugerman's argument that the 1793 Hamilton Document, that is, a list of "every person holding any civil office or employment under the United States, (except the judges)," was intended to ensure compliance with the Constitution's Sinecure Clause lacks support.] [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 1:28 am
Source: New York Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), April 29, 2007 Categories Included: Corrections Law, Criminal Procedure Law, Judiciary Law and Penal Law. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:03 am by Keith Gerver
 The ethical and legal issues are this: it has nothing to do with the debate between Johnson and Koh, but a higher level. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 5:46 pm by Erik Gerding
Google v China: Do we know corporate social responsibility when we see it? [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:15 am by Mandelman
(In case you’re wondering, the remaining five are Microsoft, Pfizer, Exxon-Mobil, Johnson & Johnson and ADP.) [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 2:50 pm by Josh H. Escovedo
Supreme Court, in a unanimous opinion authored by Justice Gorsuch, released its decision in NCAA v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
"  But even assuming that reasonable people could disagree about those points, the obvious antisemitic and anti-American campus incidents are too numerous to list comprehensively. [read post]
28 May 2012, 4:08 am by Charon QC
  She used a wonderful ‘Celia Johnson disguised voice’ and laughed a lot. [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 6:47 am
That carefully composed legal opinion makes it somewhat hard for a judge's critics to convince people — especially anyone who likes the outcome — that the judge did not decide the case according to an unbiased legal method of analysis. [read post]