Search for: "Thomas v. Thomas"
Results 2401 - 2420
of 19,664
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2023, 1:05 pm
Ciminelli v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 3:28 pm
On February 20, 2013, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Johnson v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 7:05 am
Justice Thomas filed a dissent. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 12:26 pm
On January 9, 2013, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Already, LLC v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 2:06 pm
On February 25, 2015, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Yates v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 9:15 am
On February 20, 2013, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Evans v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 11:43 am
The woman's surviving family sued the Chicago hospital for its surgical negligence and received a $2.5 million settlement in Thomas Kraska, etc. v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 8:01 am
SEB S.A. (2011) Download Global-Tech v SEBMajority: Alito (author), Roberts, C.J., Scalia, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:05 pm
(Today's opinion, after the break.)Capitol Records v Jammie Rasset [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
This afternoon brings the most anticipated game of the World Cup yet - Spain v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 5:07 am
Thomas v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 5:07 am
Thomas v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 4:30 am
Peruta v. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 2:00 am
On appeal from: [2019] EWCA Civ 200 The Supreme Court has unanimously allowed this appeal concerning whether title to land, gifted to Oxfordshire County Council for use as a school under the School Sites Act 1841 (“the 1841 Act”), reverted to the donor’s estate when the school ceased to operate from the gifted land. [read post]
10 May 2016, 7:34 am
Real property — Foreclosure sale — Motion for abatement of interest, taxes and other charges This appeal was brought by Ocean Holdings, LLC (hereinafter “Ocean Holdings”) from the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County’s denial of its motion for abatement on February 25, 2015. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 4:25 pm
An opinion from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals last week affirms a trial court ruling that a jury's $1.6 million punitive damages award, on top of a compensatory award of about $280,000 (a 5.7:1 ratio between punitive and compensatory damages), was excessive, in violation of federal due process principles. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 8:45 pm
See Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 12:15 pm
The case is Sharp v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 7:39 am
Thomas also relies on the court’s earlier decision in Shamrock Oil v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 10:55 pm
As Justices Thomas and Scalia discuss in their separate dissents in Mitchell v. [read post]
