Search for: "Trade Secret Inc."
Results 2401 - 2420
of 4,056
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2010, 5:04 am
"A trade-secret claim based on readily observable material is a bust. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
(IP Osgoode) WIPO and the future of IP (IP Osgoode) Global - Trade Marks / Brands Trade mark portfolio management software: market survey (Class 46) Trade mark licences: Beware of the unconventional – Australian case Pacific Brands Sports & Leisure Pty. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 11:05 am
Mesa Air Group, Inc., No. 07-00007, 2007 WL 842064 (D. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 1:12 am
In doing so, the district court made clear that such carve-outs for trade secret protection do not necessarily inspire the same level of suspicion that other types of exclusions do. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
Of those, eight were filed in response to patent applications submitted by Mind Medicine, Inc. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 5:30 am
Google http://t.co/qvpXWTBETl -> Google-Backed Creative Commons Wants Taxpayers To Subsidize Their Hustle http://t.co/6SbgYKxPC3 -> Class Actions Seek To Expand Law Of Privacy Breaches in Canada http://t.co/uAUToO7Z8N -> With easy access comes easy hypocrisy http://t.co/8QQVz7UWyG -> $16 Million Awarded By Arbitrator Against 50 Cent in Trade Secret Spat http://t.co/ehlG4eYWYA -> RT @lauren_dean6: @mattdiederichs with the CASL everything has changed. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:42 am
Defamation * US Dominion Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2022, 10:00 am
The Mavrick Law Firm represents clients in breach of contract litigation, non-compete agreement litigation, trade secret litigation, trademark infringement litigation, employment litigation, and other legal disputes in federal and state courts and in arbitration. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 4:01 pm
The Mavrick Law Firm represents businesses and their owners in breach of contract litigation and related claims of fraud, non-compete agreement litigation, trade secret litigation, trademark infringement litigation, employment litigation, and other legal disputes in federal and state courts and in arbitration. [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 10:00 am
The Mavrick Law Firm represents businesses and their owners in breach of contract litigation and related claims of fraud, non-compete agreement litigation, trade secret litigation, trademark infringement litigation, employment litigation, and other legal disputes in federal and state courts and in arbitration. [read post]
2 Apr 2022, 8:48 am
The Mavrick Law Firm represents clients in breach of contract litigation, non-compete agreement litigation, trade secret litigation, trademark infringement litigation, employment law, and other legal disputes in federal and state courts and in arbitration. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 12:24 pm
The Mavrick Law Firm represents clients in breach of contract litigation, non-compete agreement litigation, trade secret litigation, trademark infringement litigation, and other legal disputes in federal and state courts and in arbitration. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 9:40 pm
Motley Crue’s “Drum Ring” Isn’t Stolen Trade Secret King v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 6:30 pm
Coverage from the Trade Secrets Vault is here. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
Our Chicago non-compete and non-solicitation agreement lawyers have defended high level executives in covenant not to compete and trade secret lawsuits. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 8:13 am
Sept. 15 (Bloomberg) -- Kolon Industries Inc. lost a $919.9 million jury verdict to DuPont Co. over the theft of trade secrets about the manufacture of Kevlar, an anti-ballistic fiber used in police and military gear. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 12:38 pm
Id.But how did the Court get around the seemingly insurmountable trade secret and confidentiality concerns raised by Ethicon with respect to its internal studies? [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 12:37 pm
The case is Medical Staffing Network, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 6:36 am
, shifting from patents to trade secrets, or vice versa). [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 4:24 pm
Happily, the Court of International Trade has given us another chapter in the Home Depot USA Inc v. [read post]