Search for: "US v. Miller"
Results 2401 - 2420
of 4,241
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2015, 12:51 pm
Keep Our Mountains Quiet v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 10:05 am
In 2014 post-conviction proceedings based on Miller v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 3:21 pm
United States for the Use of Lighting and Power Services, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 5:33 am
Miller v. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 5:33 am
Miller v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 am
First, the law requires some business to verify the age of users using age verification software. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
NINTH CIRCUIT - COPYRIGHT LAW - FAIR USE DOCTRINE - DMCA - DIGITAL MILLENIUM COPYRIGHT ACT - TAKEDOWN NOTICES - COPYRIGHT TROLLS - MUSIC LAW - VIDEOS - YOUTUBE In Lenz v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 8:11 am
Namely, whether a conviction for robbery qualifies as a “violent felony” under ACCA even when (as in Florida and several other states) the offense may be committed using a negligible amount of force. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 11:56 am
Berkeley Hillside Preservation, et al. v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:31 am
On the same day, Mr Justice Vos will hear applications in the phone hacking cases of Hoppen v NGN and Miller v NGN. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 6:09 am
And in Yu v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 4:38 pm
The Sixth District Court of Appeal recently presided over such a conflict in Save Panoche Valley v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:22 pm
And while I believe that much of the criticism against the use of depublication has been unfairly leveled, from my perspective as a former California Supreme Court law clerk and current litigator of many writs and appeals, it remains my view that summary depublication of unreviewed appellate opinions is a tool that the Supreme Court should use only sparingly and always with extreme caution. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
Miller v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 4:10 am
Lund, Salazar v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 1:37 pm
Two DVDs--Jay Sin's Milk Nymphos and Joey Silvera's Storm Squirters 2 (not to be confused with the opera of the same name), are obscene, according to the government, in that, taken as a whole, they lack serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value, which is the obscenity standard set by the Supreme Court in Miller v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 7:10 am
UL LLC v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 4:55 am
F.F.T., LLC v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 5:59 pm
In the Tarrant County war against DWI, the Court affirmed Reed v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 11:27 am
The Rough Notes Company, Inc. v. [read post]
