Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 2401 - 2420
of 13,833
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2009, 7:45 am
On Wednesday, the California Supreme Court will hear argument in Costco Wholesale v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 6:44 am
In United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 6:25 pm
Like other sanctuary cases currently in the federal courts, United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 7:05 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
In referring to the recent TCL v Ericsson decision from the Central District of California (see Kat post here), Judge Labson stated:"The Court is not persuaded by Plaintiffs’ argument that summary judgment on Count III of the FAC is warranted. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 4:22 pm
The United States Supreme Court established a framework for evaluating discrimination claims based on circumstantial evidence in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 6:32 am
United States, . . . . [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 9:08 am
Tahsuda (Indian Child Welfare Act - Constitutionality) State of California v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 12:25 pm
United States (Trust Relationship; Arizona-Florida Land Exchange Act)Adams v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:38 pm
The opinion is more or less mandated by United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 9:05 am
California, 401 U.S. 797 (1971); State v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 9:05 am
California, 401 U.S. 797 (1971); State v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 11:10 am
NCS Healthcare, Inc., 818 A.2d 914 (Del. 2003), and instead relied upon the reasoning of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Jewel Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 2:19 pm
(Needless to say, the focal point of this exception is right here in California.)The opinion by Judge Clifton highlights a variety of things; most particularly, the complexities that arise as a result of marijuana being legal (in certain settings) under state law but still illegal under federal law. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 1:57 pm
State of Washington (Treaty Right to Take Shellfish) California Valley Miwok Tribe v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 5:06 pm
In Williams v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 2:14 pm
In California, the state trademark application is processed with the California Secretary of State. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 3:51 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 2:52 pm
Ct. 1740 (2011), the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that “California’s Discover Bank rule is preempted by the [Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 9:24 am
In his majority decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
