Search for: "United States v. Doe"
Results 2401 - 2420
of 44,303
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2010, 10:53 pm
" United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 1:00 pm
The first, also in the Ninth Circuit, is the long-running Doe v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:00 am
In Dennis v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
United States, 21-8190Issue: Whether the Supreme Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 5:00 pm
On January 12, in Sykes v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 5:50 am
The United States Supreme Court recently held in Heien v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 7:52 am
These conditions had been challenged as an unconstitutional delegation of authority under the New York and United States Constitutions. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 7:43 pm
United States. [read post]
12 May 2015, 10:49 am
State v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:13 am
The Appellate Division sustained a Supreme Court ruling that rejected the New York-New Jersey Port Authority's arguments that as a bi-state entity created by a federally approved compact it cannot be held liable under Labor Law §§240(1) or 241(6) for injuries plaintiff allegedly sustained while working in a building owned by the Authority.The court explained that the Compact Clause of the United States Constitution is not implicated by the application of… [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:13 am
The Appellate Division sustained a Supreme Court ruling that rejected the New York-New Jersey Port Authority's arguments that as a bi-state entity created by a federally approved compact it cannot be held liable under Labor Law §§240(1) or 241(6) for injuries plaintiff allegedly sustained while working in a building owned by the Authority.The court explained that the Compact Clause of the United States Constitution is not implicated by the application of… [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 5:04 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 9:08 am
” Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 3:33 pm
The defendant moved to dismiss the charges on the basis that the statute was unconstitutional as a result of the United States Supreme Court's decisions in District of Columbia v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 7:49 am
It does, according to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 7:49 am
It does, according to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 12:01 am
In June, the Supreme Court agreed to review this question: Does the constitutional test for determining whether a section of a river is navigable for title purposes require a trial court to determine, based on evidence, whether the relevant stretch of the river was navigable at the time the State joined the Union as directed by United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 5:53 pm
But what does the duty require in practice? [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 7:31 pm
How does a U.S. company protect itself in its home state when threatened with patent infringement by patents owned by a foreign company? [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 12:42 pm
Y. v. [read post]
