Search for: "United States v. Minor"
Results 2401 - 2420
of 6,238
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2023, 1:01 am
He immigrated to the United States in 1884. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 1:20 pm
The April 12, 2023, Court of Appeals opinion in Taylor v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 6:56 am
Supreme Court’s controversial ruling in Husted v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 3:21 pm
Disparate impact was established United States Supreme Court as Ricci v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 5:05 am
Could this conflict among the circuits now head to the United States Supreme Court for resolution? [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 12:32 pm
Drake, M.D., today (June 24) issued the following statement on the United States Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 10:05 pm
It was aimed at states and local government units that had a history of discriminating against minority voters. [read post]
13 May 2008, 6:00 am
We don't know what that title means; we just wanted to draw some mathematicians to our blog.Well, no.Actually, we just read United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 5:23 am
v=etXYIozoACw The United States Supreme Court’s Decision on Non-exempt Employee’s Work Day This past Tuesday, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
Trump v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:03 pm
In 2008, the Project sued the state agency, accusing it of concentrating its efforts in areas mainly populated by minorities. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 4:16 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 12:55 pm
Although this opinion is not binding on California courts, it was authored by then-Judge Samuel Alito, who is now a justice of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 8:45 am
All of his immediate family members are United States citizens or lawful permanent residents. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 8:40 am
The case involving the REDSKINS mark is currently on hold until the United States Supreme Court decides the In re Tam case. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 8:10 am
United States, and can be read here. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 7:56 am
United States. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 2:53 pm
Whether all reasonable steps have been taken will be fact-specific and the hurdle is a high one; the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) stated in its Statutory Code of Practice that “an employer would be considered to have taken all reasonable steps if there were no further steps that they could have been expected to take…” The scope of the defence was recently considered by the employment tribunal (ET) in Fischer v London United Busways Ltd,… [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 3:27 am
--> After a jury convicted him of “attempting to entice a minor to engage in sexual activity, in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 6:13 am
Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply United States Steel Corp. v. [read post]
