Search for: "Adame v. State" Results 2421 - 2440 of 5,021
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2016, 5:00 am
Ct. 2567 (2011), was decided.Tsavaris also held preempted a claim for failure to test (which Florida law doesn’t recognize as a tort theory to start with, Adams v. [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The CBA further provides that the CSEA may request arbitration with respect to a grievance, but no provision in the CBA permits an employee to request arbitration, nor is there a provision that makes the employees a party to the collective bargaining agreement (see generally Matter of Case v Monroe Community Coll., 89 NY2d 438, 442-443 [1997]; Matter of Diaz v Pilgrim State Psychiatric Ctr. of State of N.Y., 62 NY2d 693, 695 [1984]). [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 8:08 am by Jonathan Bailey
Let me know via Twitter @plagiarismtoday. 1: Supreme Court Hears Copyright Battle Between Google and Oracle First off today, Adam Liptak at The New York Times reports that the Supreme Court of the United States heard arguments in the Google v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 12:56 pm
Maybe that means that we'll get it right this time.Anyway, as regular readers of this blog know, Wyeth filed its principal merits brief in Wyeth v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:45 am by Conor McEvily
Today the Court will hear oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am by Benjamin Coates
For instance, the transfer of Indian Affairs from the Department of War to the Department of the Interior in 1849 prefigured the later ruling, in Lone Wolf v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 3:00 am by Chip Merlin
While Florida Supreme Court Justices may not be aware of it, the readers of this blog know that appraisal rules vary from state to state. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 2:50 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Adams, No. 112673 et seq. -- Did the trial court properly dismiss an action challenging the constitutionality of the Illinois Parental Notice of Abortion Act, brought solely under state law, on the grounds that the plaintiffs' equal protection and due process claims were barred by collateral estoppel, and the plaintiffs' privacy claim was barred because Federal privacy law would require dismissal, and state privacy protections were interpreted in lockstep with… [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 6:59 am by James Bickford
  Today, the Court hears argument in McComish v. [read post]