Search for: "Akins v. State"
Results 2421 - 2440
of 3,091
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2010, 8:37 am
I rise now to defend the Court of Chancery's decision in TR Investors LLC v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
United States and Black v. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 7:12 am
United States, Black v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 11:20 am
Yesterday, in Magwood v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 8:46 am
M.S.S. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 12:45 pm
United States and Black v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 1:50 pm
Although the Court held a few years ago in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 9:20 am
[Disclosure: Akin Gump and Howe & Russell represent the petitioner in the case.] [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 6:36 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 6:28 pm
The legal, business, and scientific communities eagerly await the Supreme Court’s ruling in Bilski v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm
United States (09-977); United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:45 am
Texas, which is also slated for argument next Term (disclosure: Akin Gump and Howe & Russell represent the petitioner in Sossamon) may make the upcoming Term “the bellwether for the Roberts Court when it comes to either following or retreating from the Rehnquist Court” on issues relating to state sovereign immunity. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 5:57 am
Yesterday in Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 2:03 pm
” Wieder v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 6:23 am
United States, Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 6:22 am
United States (No. 09-6338), the Court rejected the petitioner’s contention that its decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 7:53 pm
This is an early take on today’s Supreme Court of Canada decision in Ontario (Public Safety and Security) v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:41 am
Your research focuses on the selection of state supreme court judges, for which there are four different selection systems currently used: partisan judicial elections, nonpartisan judicial elections, merit selection with retention elections (the Missouri Plan), and appointment (akin to the appointment process for federal judges). [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 11:00 am
Fifth, the Court reasoned, it had “previously interpreted similar statutes” – such as the Bail Reform Act, in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 8:30 am
[Akin Gump and Howe & Russell also represented the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
