Search for: "BANKS v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 2421 - 2440
of 3,052
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2017, 9:30 am
And in its 2014 Alice Corp. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:06 pm
Pierce explained that in 1983, the Supreme Court’s MVMA v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 11:54 pm
College London"Feminism v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 5:13 am
Additional Resources: Medina v. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 1:29 pm
The Draft Bill expressly preempts the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”) and California’s soon-to-be-effective California Privacy Rights Act (“CPRA”), with the exception of Section 1798.150 of the California Civil Code, which provides a private right of action for certain data breaches. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:17 pm
Fraley v Facebook in the Northern District of California District Court (highlighted by tech site Mashable) is a class action law suit against the social media behemoth which involves the state’s Right of Publicity statute. [read post]
11 May 2018, 2:25 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 8:29 am
(See ALS Scan, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 10:18 am
Loewy’s article Why Roe v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:44 am
Clover Gifts, Inc (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) District Court N D California: Though geographically descriptive, claim mark was suggestive not groundless: Sand Hill Advisors, LLC v. [read post]
13 May 2018, 4:09 pm
On 11 May 2018 Nicol J handed down judgment in the case of Reid v Newsquest (Midlands South) Ltd. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:56 am
Opinion below (Supreme Court of Virginia) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Docket: 09-329 Title: Chase Bank USA v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 2:53 pm
A 2017 case in California state court might be instructive. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 12:46 am
California, Davis, School of Law; Adrienne Davis, U. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 6:17 am
Posted by Ruth V. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 9:53 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 1:10 pm
Supreme Court’s June 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
15 Dec 2024, 9:01 pm
The CFPB has continued to focus on curbing the monetization of consumer data through a variety of initiatives, including its recent final rule on personal financial data rights (the so-called “open banking” rule) as well as its recent proposed rule amending Regulation V and implementing new interpretations of FCRA. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm
” In reaching this latter conclusoin, Judge Sullivan rejected the applicability of the 1928 Zeig v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am
Johnson forAmici Curiae United Trustee’s Association and California Mortgage Association.Leland Chan for Amicus Curiae California Bankers Association.I. [read post]
